Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KHACHUKAYEVY v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KHACHUKAYEVY v. RUSSIA

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 09.06.2005 - 55723/00

  FADEÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.02.2016 - 34576/08

  The Court has to establish first whether the costs and expenses indicated by the applicants" representatives were actually incurred and, second, whether they were necessary and reasonable as to quantum (see McCann and Others, cited above, § 220, and Fadeyeva v. Russia, no. 55723/00, § 147, ECHR 2005-IV).
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 69480/01

  LOULOUÏEV ET AUTRES c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.02.2016 - 34576/08

  When there is a long time between a missing person's disappearance and his or her death, there is a distinct period during which an applicant suffers the uncertainty, anguish and distress characteristic of the specific phenomenon of disappearances (see Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, § 115, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 25656/94

  ORHAN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.02.2016 - 34576/08

  The essence of such a violation does not lie mainly in the fact of the "disappearance" of the family member, but rather concerns the authorities" reaction and attitude to the situation when it is brought to their attention (see Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 358, 18 June 2002, and Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 164, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).

 
• EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94

  AVSAR c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.02.2016 - 34576/08

  A number of principles have been developed by the Court when it has been faced with the task of establishing the facts of events on which the parties disagree (see El-Masri v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" [GC], no. 39630/09, §§ 151-53, ECHR 2012): the factual findings should be based on the standard of proof "beyond reasonable doubt"; and such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 282, ECHR 2001-VII, and Tanis and Others v. Turkey, no. 65899/01, § 160, ECHR 2005-VIII).
• EGMR, 02.08.2005 - 65899/01

  TANIS ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.02.2016 - 34576/08

  A number of principles have been developed by the Court when it has been faced with the task of establishing the facts of events on which the parties disagree (see El-Masri v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" [GC], no. 39630/09, §§ 151-53, ECHR 2012): the factual findings should be based on the standard of proof "beyond reasonable doubt"; and such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 282, ECHR 2001-VII, and Tanis and Others v. Turkey, no. 65899/01, § 160, ECHR 2005-VIII).
• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.02.2016 - 34576/08

  In the light of the importance of the protection afforded by Article 2 of the Convention, the Court must subject deprivation of life to the most careful scrutiny, taking into consideration not only the actions of State agents but also all the surrounding circumstances (see, among other authorities, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 146-47, Series A no. 324, and Avsar, cited above, § 391).
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02

  IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.02.2016 - 34576/08

  The essence of such a violation does not lie mainly in the fact of the "disappearance" of the family member, but rather concerns the authorities" reaction and attitude to the situation when it is brought to their attention (see Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 358, 18 June 2002, and Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 164, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).

• EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 15980/12

  MASLOVA c. RUSSIE

  La Cour observe que pareil montant représente environ 10 % de ce qu'elle octroie généralement dans des affaires russes similaires (voir, par exemple, Dalakov c. Russie, no 35152/09, § 94, 16 février 2016, Nazyrova et autres c. Russie, nos 21126/09, 63620/09, 64811/09, 32965/10 et 64270/11, § 179, 9 février 2016, et Khachukayevy c. Russie, no 34576/08, § 85, 9 février 2016 ; dans toutes ces affaires, la Cour a alloué 60 000 EUR à titre de dommage moral).