Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 59261/00   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2006,40602
EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 59261/00 (https://dejure.org/2006,40602)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 09.03.2006 - 59261/00 (https://dejure.org/2006,40602)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 09. März 2006 - 59261/00 (https://dejure.org/2006,40602)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,40602) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    MENECHEVA c. RUSSIE

    Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 41 MRK
    Violations de l'art. 3 Violation de l'art. 13 (aucun recours quant aux mauvais traitements) Violations de l'art. 5-1 Violation de l'art. 6-1 Aucune question distincte au regard des art. 5-4 et 13 (aucun droit à un double degré de juridiction) Dommage matériel - ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    MENESHEVA v. RUSSIA

    Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 41 MRK
    Violations of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 13 (no remedy in respect of ill-treatment) Violations of Art. 5-1 Violation of Art. 6-1 No separate issues under Art. 5-4 and 13 (no right to appeal) Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ...

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (101)Neu Zitiert selbst (15)

  • EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 9783/82

    KAMASINSKI v. AUSTRIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 59261/00
    As regards Article 13, the Court observes that Article 6 § 1 is a lex specialis in relation to Article 13, in other words the requirements of Article 13 are less strict than, and are here absorbed by, those of Article 6 (see, mutatis mutandis, Kamasinski v. Austria, 19 December 1989, § 110, Series A no. 168).
  • EGMR, 17.01.1970 - 2689/65

    DELCOURT c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 59261/00
    The Court reiterates that a right of recourse against a faulty judicial decision is not recognised as a general guarantee (see Delcourt v. Belgium, 17 January 1970, § 25, Series A no. 11).
  • EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

    Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 59261/00
    The Court reiterates that "[w]here an individual, when taken in police custody, is in good health, but is found to be injured at the time of release, it is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how those injuries were caused, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention" (see Tomasi v. France, 27 August 1992, §§ 108-11, Series A no. 241-A, and Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V).
  • EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

    LABITA c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 59261/00
    This investigation should be capable of leading to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, § 102, Reports 1998-VIII, and Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000-IV).
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

    Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 59261/00
    Indeed, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 34, Series A no. 336, and Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).
  • EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

    KABLAN contre la TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 59261/00
    The Court has previously had before it cases in which it has found that there has been treatment which could only be described as torture (see Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, § 64, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI; Aydın v. Turkey, 25 September 1997, §§ 83-84 and 86, Reports 1997-VI; Selmouni, cited above, § 105; Dikme v. Turkey, no. 20869/92, §§ 94-96, ECHR 2000-VIII; and, among recent authorities, Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 116, ECHR 2004-IV).
  • EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

    Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 59261/00
    As a general rule, if a single remedy does not by itself entirely satisfy the requirements of Article 13, the aggregate of remedies provided for under domestic law may do so (see, among many other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 157, ECHR 2000-XI; see also Conka v. Belgium, no. 51564/99, § 75, ECHR 2002-I).
  • EGMR, 05.02.2002 - 51564/99

    Belgien, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, Abschiebunghaft, Freiheit

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 59261/00
    As a general rule, if a single remedy does not by itself entirely satisfy the requirements of Article 13, the aggregate of remedies provided for under domestic law may do so (see, among many other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 157, ECHR 2000-XI; see also Conka v. Belgium, no. 51564/99, § 75, ECHR 2002-I).
  • EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57947/00

    ISSAIEVA, YOUSSOUPOVA ET BAZAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 59261/00
    The minimum standards as to effectiveness defined by the Court's case-law also include the requirements that the investigation must be independent, impartial and subject to public scrutiny, and that the competent authorities must act with exemplary diligence and promptness (see, for example, Isayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 57947/00, 57948/00 and 57949/00, §§ 208-13, 24 February 2005).
  • EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57948/00
    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 59261/00
    The minimum standards as to effectiveness defined by the Court's case-law also include the requirements that the investigation must be independent, impartial and subject to public scrutiny, and that the competent authorities must act with exemplary diligence and promptness (see, for example, Isayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 57947/00, 57948/00 and 57949/00, §§ 208-13, 24 February 2005).
  • EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

    BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 13057/87

    DEMICOLI v. MALTA

  • EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

    RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE

  • EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87

    TOMASI c. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 21.02.1984 - 8544/79

    Öztürk ./. Deutschland

  • EGMR, 10.02.2009 - 14939/03

    Sergeï Zolotoukhine ./. Russland

    As to the domestic legal classification, the Court has previously found that the sphere defined in the Russian and some other legal systems as "administrative" embraces some offences that are criminal in nature but too trivial to be governed by criminal law and procedure (see Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, § 96, ECHR 2006-...).
  • EGMR, 15.11.2018 - 29580/12

    Alexei Anatoljewitsch Nawalny

    The Court reiterates that the applicability of Article 6 falls to be assessed on the basis of the three criteria outlined in the Engel judgment, namely the legal classification of the offence under national law; the nature of the offence; and the degree of severity of the penalty that the person concerned risked incurring (see Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, §§ 82-83, Series A no. 22; Öztürk v. Germany, 21 February 1984, § 50, Series A no. 73; Demicoli v. Malta, 27 August 1991, §§ 31-34, Series A no. 210; Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, §§ 95-98, ECHR 2006-III; Ezeh and Connors v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos.
  • EGMR, 15.12.2016 - 16483/12

    Lampedusa-Haft war illegal

    It discloses a most grave violation of that provision and is incompatible with the requirement of lawfulness and with the very purpose of Article 5 (see Fedotov v. Russia, no. 5140/02, § 78, 25 October 2005; Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, § 87, ECHR 2006-III; and Kurt v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, § 125, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht