Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 12518/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,30890) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DANILINA v. RUSSIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 35, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 55926/00
LOYEN ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 12518/05
In line with this approach it had previously accepted for examination applications lodged on behalf of minors by persons lacking formal power to represent them at the domestic level (see S.D., D.P., and T v. the United Kingdom, no. 23715/94, Commission decision of 20 May 1996, unpublished, Commission report of 11 April 1997, DR 89-A, p. 31), applications lodged jointly by spouses in respect of events predominantly concerning one of them (see Houtman and Meeus v. Belgium, no. 22945/07, §§ 27-31, 17 March 2009), and applications pursued or lodged by relatives on behalf of deceased persons (see respectively Loyen and Others v. France, no. 55926/00, § 25, 29 April 2003 and Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. - EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 27996/06
SEJDIC ET FINCI c. BOSNIE-HERZÉGOVINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 12518/05
While the Russian Government did not raise any objection as to the Court's competence ratione personae, the Court must consider this issue ex officio (see Sejdic and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 27996/06 and 34836/06, § 27, ECHR 2009). - EKMR, 20.05.1996 - 23715/94
S.P., D.P. and A.T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 12518/05
In line with this approach it had previously accepted for examination applications lodged on behalf of minors by persons lacking formal power to represent them at the domestic level (see S.D., D.P., and T v. the United Kingdom, no. 23715/94, Commission decision of 20 May 1996, unpublished, Commission report of 11 April 1997, DR 89-A, p. 31), applications lodged jointly by spouses in respect of events predominantly concerning one of them (see Houtman and Meeus v. Belgium, no. 22945/07, §§ 27-31, 17 March 2009), and applications pursued or lodged by relatives on behalf of deceased persons (see respectively Loyen and Others v. France, no. 55926/00, § 25, 29 April 2003 and Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos.