Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 09.05.2006 - 54508/00 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,63230) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SAARENPAAN LOMA KY v. FINLAND
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 09.05.2006 - 54508/00
- EGMR, 13.02.2007 - 54508/00
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 21.05.2002 - 28856/95
JOKELA v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.05.2006 - 54508/00
In ascertaining whether this condition has been satisfied, a comprehensive view must be taken of the applicable procedures (see, inter alia, Jokela v. Finland, no. 28856/95, § 45, ECHR 2002-IV). - EGMR, 25.10.1989 - 10842/84
ALLAN JACOBSSON v. SWEDEN (No. 1)
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.05.2006 - 54508/00
The Court notes at the outset that the exemption permit and the activity prohibition in this case falls to be considered under the second paragraph of Article 1 of Protocol No.1 as being a measure to "control the use of property" (see, inter alia, Allan Jacobsson v. Sweden (no. 1), judgment of 25 October 1989, Series A no. 163, p. 16, § 54, Hellborg v. Sweden, no. 47473/99, § 45, 28 February 2006), whereas the expropriation, constituting a lawful deprivation of possessions, falls within the second rule, "deprivation" of the property. - EGMR, 24.10.1986 - 9118/80
AGOSI c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.05.2006 - 54508/00
However, the three rules are not "distinct" in the sense of being unconnected: the second and the third rules are concerned with particular interferences with the right to peaceful enjoyment of property and should therefore be construed in the light of the general principle enunciated in the first rule (see, among many other authorities, AGOSI v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 24 October 1986, Series A no. 108, p. 17, § 48).