Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ZHELTYAKOV v. UKRAINE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 1+P1 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 6-1+P1-1 (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96

  GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2011 - 4994/04

  Although it is primarily for the domestic courts to assess the facts and evidence before them (see, for instance, García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I), the Court considers that such a conclusion is open to doubt.
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2011 - 4994/04

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the complexity of the case and the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, for instance, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76

  GUZZARDI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2011 - 4994/04

  Nor was he required to cite any provision of the Convention (see Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, § 61, Series A no. 39).

• EGMR, 18.02.2014 - 4548/04

  STAMBOLSKA v. BULGARIA

  It is not the task of the Court to re-examine the facts of the case (see, for instance, García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I, and Zheltyakov v. Ukraine, no. 4994/04, § 46, 9 June 2011), but to assess whether the SAC's findings were not in any way arbitrary or manifestly unreasonable.
• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 52079/08

  BIRNEY v. IRELAND AND TROY AND BRENNAN v. IRELAND

  In addition, since the applicants had available to them the above-described earlier remedy, it cannot be said that there were circumstances of a substantial and compelling character which would have required a departure from that principle of legal certainty (mutatis mutandis, Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-VII; Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, §Note 52, ECHR 2003-X; and, more recently, Zheltyakov v. Ukraine, no. 4994/04, § 43, 9 June 2011).