Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 09.06.2015 - 35355/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,12610) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VELCHEVA v. BULGARIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
VELCHEVA v. BULGARIA
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 09.06.2015 - 35355/08
- EGMR, 09.02.2017 - 35355/08
- EGMR, 21.10.2020 - 35355/08
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 52854/99
RIABYKH c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2015 - 35355/08
Referring to a number of cases decided by the Court, such as Mutishev and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 18967/03, 3 December 2009), Mancheva v. Bulgaria (no. 39609/98, 30 September 2004), and Ryabykh v. Russia (no. 52854/99, ECHR 2003-IX), the applicant pointed out that the principle of legal certainty required compliance with final court judgments. - EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 39609/98
MANCHEVA v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2015 - 35355/08
Referring to a number of cases decided by the Court, such as Mutishev and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 18967/03, 3 December 2009), Mancheva v. Bulgaria (no. 39609/98, 30 September 2004), and Ryabykh v. Russia (no. 52854/99, ECHR 2003-IX), the applicant pointed out that the principle of legal certainty required compliance with final court judgments. - EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 38222/02
RAMADHI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2015 - 35355/08
In addition, the Court has held that the prolonged non-enforcement of a final court judgment giving rise to a "legitimate expectation" - and thus to a "possession" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - can be seen as problematic under that provision (see Ramadhi and Others v. Albania, no. 38222/02, §§ 76-77, 13 November 2007, and Mutishev and Others, cited above, § 125). - EGMR, 02.05.2006 - 5667/02
KÉRÉTCHACHVILI c. GEORGIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2015 - 35355/08
It notes also that under Article 35(3)(a) of the Convention it may reject an application as constituting an abuse, and that this would be so, for example, in cases where the application was knowingly based on untrue facts (see, among other authorities, Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, § 36, ECHR 2000-X; Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, §§ 53-54, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; and Kerechashvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 5667/02, 2 May 2006).