Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 09.06.2016 - 38840/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,15395) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GYULEVA v. BULGARIA
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
GYULEVA v. BULGARIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 09.06.2016 - 38840/08
- EGMR, 17.10.2017 - 38840/08
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 23.05.2006 - 24379/02
KOUNOV c. BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2016 - 38840/08
In numerous cases concerning complaints about the fairness of criminal proceedings, the Court has held that although proceedings which took place in the accused's absence are not in themselves incompatible with Article 6 of the Convention, a denial of justice nevertheless occurs where a person convicted in absentia is unable subsequently to obtain from a court which has heard him or her a fresh determination of the merits of the charge, in respect of both law and fact, where it has not been established that he or she waived his or her right to appear and to defend him- or herself (see, for example, Colozza v. Italy, 12 February 1985, § 29, Series A no. 89; Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 82, ECHR 2006-II; and Kounov v. Bulgaria, no. 24379/02, § 42, 23 May 2006). - EGMR, 23.06.1993 - 12952/87
RUIZ-MATEOS c. ESPAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2016 - 38840/08
However, the general concept of a fair trial, encompassing also the fundamental principle that proceedings should be adversarial (see Ruiz-Mateos v. Spain, 23 June 1993, § 63, Series A no. 262), requires that all parties to civil proceedings should have the opportunity to have knowledge of and comment on the observations filed or evidence adduced with a view to influencing the court's decision (see Lobo Machado v. Portugal, 20 February 1996, § 31, Reports 1996-I). - EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2016 - 38840/08
It also notes that the Government have not put forward any particular arguments in that regard, whereas it is in principle incumbent on them to satisfy the Court that the remedy referred to by them was available and effective (see, for example, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999-V).