Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  JERET v. ESTONIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  JERET v. ESTONIA

  Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 7496/03

  FILIZ UYAN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2020 - 42110/17

  In this regard it is important to consider, for instance, whether there is a danger that the person concerned might abscond or cause injury or damage to himself or herself or to others (see Filiz Uyan v. Turkey, no. 7496/03, § 30, 8 January 2009, and Tarariyeva v. Russia, no. 4353/03, § 109, ECHR 2006-XV (extracts)) as well as the particular circumstances of a transfer to hospital for medical treatment (see Henaf v. France, no. 65436/01, § 48, ECHR 2003-XI, and Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, § 47, ECHR 2002-IX).
• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00

  Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2020 - 42110/17

  As regards the Government's argument that the applicant could have sought compensation under the national law, the Court reiterates that an applicant who has already exhausted domestic remedies to no avail before complaining to this Court of a violation of his or her rights is not obliged to do so a second time in order to be able to obtain just satisfaction from the Court (see Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 129, ECHR 2006-IX; and Julin, cited above, § 199).
• EGMR, 14.12.2006 - 4353/03

  TARARIEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2020 - 42110/17

  In this regard it is important to consider, for instance, whether there is a danger that the person concerned might abscond or cause injury or damage to himself or herself or to others (see Filiz Uyan v. Turkey, no. 7496/03, § 30, 8 January 2009, and Tarariyeva v. Russia, no. 4353/03, § 109, ECHR 2006-XV (extracts)) as well as the particular circumstances of a transfer to hospital for medical treatment (see Henaf v. France, no. 65436/01, § 48, ECHR 2003-XI, and Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, § 47, ECHR 2002-IX).
• EGMR, 02.12.2011 - 67263/01

  AFFAIRES MOUISEL ET HENAF CONTRE LA FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2020 - 42110/17

  In this regard it is important to consider, for instance, whether there is a danger that the person concerned might abscond or cause injury or damage to himself or herself or to others (see Filiz Uyan v. Turkey, no. 7496/03, § 30, 8 January 2009, and Tarariyeva v. Russia, no. 4353/03, § 109, ECHR 2006-XV (extracts)) as well as the particular circumstances of a transfer to hospital for medical treatment (see Henaf v. France, no. 65436/01, § 48, ECHR 2003-XI, and Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, § 47, ECHR 2002-IX).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.2020 - 42110/17

  When an individual makes a credible assertion that he has suffered treatment infringing Article 3 at the hands of the police or other similar agents of the State, that provision, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 of the Convention to "secure to everyone within their jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in... [the] Convention", requires by implication that there should be an effective official investigation (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000-IV, and Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, § 102, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VIII).

• EGMR, 28.03.2024 - 35960/14

  MURSALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  The Court reiterates that an applicant who has already exhausted domestic remedies to no avail before complaining to this Court of a violation of his or her rights is not obliged to do so a second time in order to be able to obtain just satisfaction from the Court (compare Jeret v. Estonia [Committee], no. 42110/17, § 85, 9 June 2020, with further references).