Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 2330/09 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (22)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SINDICATUL « PASTORUL CEL BUN » c. ROUMANIE
Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 2 MRK
Non-violation de l'article 11 - Liberté de réunion et d'association (Article 11-1 - Liberté d'association) (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SINDICATUL \
Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 2 MRK
No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of association) (englisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SINDICATUL \
Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 2 MRK
[SPA] No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of association)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SINDICATUL \
Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 2 MRK
[MKD] No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of association) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SINDICATUL \
Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 2 MRK
[TUR] No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of association) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SINDICATUL \
Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 2 MRK
[RON] No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of association) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SINDICATUL \
Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 2 MRK
[HYE] No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of association) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SINDICATUL \
Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 2 MRK
[SQI] No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of association) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SINDICATUL \
Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 2 MRK
[HYE] No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of association) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SINDICATUL \
Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 2 MRK
[KAT] No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of association) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SINDICATUL \
Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 2 MRK
[SQI] No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of association) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SINDICATUL \
Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 2 MRK
[BOS] No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of association) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SINDICATUL \
Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 2 MRK
[AZE] No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of association) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SINDICATUL \
Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 2 MRK
[KAT] No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of association) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SINDICATUL \
Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 2 MRK
[RON] No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of association) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SINDICATUL \
Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 2 MRK
[AZE] No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of association) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SINDICATUL \
Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 2 MRK
[MKD] No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of association) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SINDICATUL \
[TUR] No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of association)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SINDICATUL 'PASTORUL CEL BUN' v. ROMANIA - [Deutsche Übersetzung] by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
[DEU] No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of association)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SINDICATUL \
[GRE] No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of association)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SINDICATUL \
[TUR] No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of association)
- juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
Kurzfassungen/Presse (2)
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
- juraforum.de (Kurzinformation)
Kein Anspruch auf staatliche Registrierung für Priestergewerkschaft
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 31.01.2012 - 2330/09
- EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 2330/09
Wird zitiert von ... (3) Neu Zitiert selbst (15)
- EGMR, 27.06.2002 - 38190/97
FEDERATION DES SYNDICATS DE TRAVAILLEURS OFFSHORE et AUTRES c. NORVEGE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 2330/09
Specifically, to address the perceived dangers alluded to by the Romanian Government regarding the applicant union's potential right to strike - although this is certainly one of the most important union rights - the Grand Chamber judgment should have taken into account two aspects of the Court's case-law: (1) the right to strike is not an absolute right (see Schmidt and Dahlström v. Sweden, 6 February 1976, § 36, Series A no. 21, and Dilek and Others v. Turkey, nos. 74611/01, 26876/02 and 27628/02, § 68, 17 July 2007), and (2) limitations on the right to strike may under certain circumstances be permissible in a democratic society (see UNISON v. the United Kingdom (dec.) no. 53574/99, ECHR 2002-I; Federation of Offshore Workers" Trade Unions and Others v. Norway (dec.), no. 38190/97, ECHR 2002-VI; and Enerji Yapı-Yol Sen v. Turkey, no. 68959/01, § 32, 21 April 2009). - EGMR, 21.04.2009 - 68959/01
Streikverbot für Staatsdiener: Gewerkschaften sehen volles Streikrecht für Beamte …
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 2330/09
Specifically, to address the perceived dangers alluded to by the Romanian Government regarding the applicant union's potential right to strike - although this is certainly one of the most important union rights - the Grand Chamber judgment should have taken into account two aspects of the Court's case-law: (1) the right to strike is not an absolute right (see Schmidt and Dahlström v. Sweden, 6 February 1976, § 36, Series A no. 21, and Dilek and Others v. Turkey, nos. 74611/01, 26876/02 and 27628/02, § 68, 17 July 2007), and (2) limitations on the right to strike may under certain circumstances be permissible in a democratic society (see UNISON v. the United Kingdom (dec.) no. 53574/99, ECHR 2002-I; Federation of Offshore Workers" Trade Unions and Others v. Norway (dec.), no. 38190/97, ECHR 2002-VI; and Enerji Yapı-Yol Sen v. Turkey, no. 68959/01, § 32, 21 April 2009). - EGMR, 06.02.1976 - 5589/72
SCHMIDT ET DAHLSTRÖM c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 2330/09
Specifically, to address the perceived dangers alluded to by the Romanian Government regarding the applicant union's potential right to strike - although this is certainly one of the most important union rights - the Grand Chamber judgment should have taken into account two aspects of the Court's case-law: (1) the right to strike is not an absolute right (see Schmidt and Dahlström v. Sweden, 6 February 1976, § 36, Series A no. 21, and Dilek and Others v. Turkey, nos. 74611/01, 26876/02 and 27628/02, § 68, 17 July 2007), and (2) limitations on the right to strike may under certain circumstances be permissible in a democratic society (see UNISON v. the United Kingdom (dec.) no. 53574/99, ECHR 2002-I; Federation of Offshore Workers" Trade Unions and Others v. Norway (dec.), no. 38190/97, ECHR 2002-VI; and Enerji Yapı-Yol Sen v. Turkey, no. 68959/01, § 32, 21 April 2009).
- EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 74611/01
DILEK ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 2330/09
Specifically, to address the perceived dangers alluded to by the Romanian Government regarding the applicant union's potential right to strike - although this is certainly one of the most important union rights - the Grand Chamber judgment should have taken into account two aspects of the Court's case-law: (1) the right to strike is not an absolute right (see Schmidt and Dahlström v. Sweden, 6 February 1976, § 36, Series A no. 21, and Dilek and Others v. Turkey, nos. 74611/01, 26876/02 and 27628/02, § 68, 17 July 2007), and (2) limitations on the right to strike may under certain circumstances be permissible in a democratic society (see UNISON v. the United Kingdom (dec.) no. 53574/99, ECHR 2002-I; Federation of Offshore Workers" Trade Unions and Others v. Norway (dec.), no. 38190/97, ECHR 2002-VI; and Enerji Yapı-Yol Sen v. Turkey, no. 68959/01, § 32, 21 April 2009). - EGMR, 10.01.2002 - 53574/99
UNISON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 2330/09
Specifically, to address the perceived dangers alluded to by the Romanian Government regarding the applicant union's potential right to strike - although this is certainly one of the most important union rights - the Grand Chamber judgment should have taken into account two aspects of the Court's case-law: (1) the right to strike is not an absolute right (see Schmidt and Dahlström v. Sweden, 6 February 1976, § 36, Series A no. 21, and Dilek and Others v. Turkey, nos. 74611/01, 26876/02 and 27628/02, § 68, 17 July 2007), and (2) limitations on the right to strike may under certain circumstances be permissible in a democratic society (see UNISON v. the United Kingdom (dec.) no. 53574/99, ECHR 2002-I; Federation of Offshore Workers" Trade Unions and Others v. Norway (dec.), no. 38190/97, ECHR 2002-VI; and Enerji Yapı-Yol Sen v. Turkey, no. 68959/01, § 32, 21 April 2009). - EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 25390/94
REKVÉNYI c. HONGRIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 2330/09
The interpretation of the Contracting Parties" domestic law is primarily a matter for the national courts (see, among other authorities, Rekvényi v. Hungary [GC], no. 25390/94, § 35, ECHR 1999-III). - EGMR, 13.12.2001 - 45701/99
METROPOLITAN CHURCH OF BESSARABIA AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 2330/09
Were the organisational life of the community not protected by Article 9, all other aspects of the individual's freedom of religion would become vulnerable (see Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985/96, § 62, ECHR 2000-XI; Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova, no. 45701/99, § 118, ECHR 2001-XII; and Holy Synod of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church (Metropolitan Inokentiy) and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. - EGMR, 25.03.1992 - 13590/88
CAMPBELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 2330/09
It further reiterates that the phrase "prescribed by law" refers in the first place to national law and that it is not, in principle, for the Court to examine the validity of "secondary legislation", that being primarily a matter for the national courts (see Campbell v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1992, § 37, Series A no. 233). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30985/96
HASSAN ET TCHAOUCH c. BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 2330/09
Were the organisational life of the community not protected by Article 9, all other aspects of the individual's freedom of religion would become vulnerable (see Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985/96, § 62, ECHR 2000-XI; Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova, no. 45701/99, § 118, ECHR 2001-XII; and Holy Synod of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church (Metropolitan Inokentiy) and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. - EGMR, 04.05.2000 - 28341/95
ROTARU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 2330/09
The Court reiterates its settled case-law to the effect that the expression "prescribed by law" not only requires that the impugned measures should have some basis in domestic law, but also refers to the quality of the law in question, which must be sufficiently accessible to the person concerned and foreseeable as to its effects (see Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 52, ECHR 2000-V). - EGMR, 03.02.2011 - 18136/02
Kündigung einer bei der evangelischen Kirche angestellten Kindergärtnerin wegen …
- EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29225/95
- EGMR, 12.04.2005 - 36378/02
CHAMAÏEV ET AUTRES c. GEORGIE ET RUSSIE
- EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29221/95
STANKOV AND THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 11.01.2006 - 52562/99
SØRENSEN ET RASMUSSEN c. DANEMARK
- BVerfG, 22.10.2014 - 2 BvR 661/12
Vertraglich vereinbarte Loyalitätsobliegenheiten in kirchlichen …
Ohne diesen Schutz der Organisation nach Maßgabe des religiösen Selbstverständnisses durch die Konvention wäre auch die effektive Wahrnehmung der individuellen Religionsfreiheit beeinträchtigt (vgl. zu alledem: EGMR (GK), Hasan u. Chaush v. Bulgarien, Urteil vom 26. Oktober 2000, Nr. 30985/96, § 62; EGMR, Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia u.a. v. Moldawien, Urteil vom 13. Dezember 2001, Nr. 45701/99, § 118; EGMR, Holy Synod of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church (Metropolitan Inokentiy) v. Bulgarien, Urteil vom 22. Januar 2009, Nr. 412/03 u.a., § 103; EGMR (GK), Sindicatul "Pastorul cel Bun" v. Rumänien, Urteil vom 9. Juli 2013, Nr. 2330/09, § 136; EGMR (GK), Fernández Martínez v. Spanien, Urteil vom 12. Juni 2014, Nr. 56030/07, § 127).aa) Das Autonomierecht beinhaltet das Recht der Kirche oder Religionsgemeinschaft, nach ihren Rechtssätzen und nach ihrem Ermessen auf ein Verhalten ihrer Mitglieder zu reagieren, das eine Bedrohung für den Zusammenhalt, die Glaubwürdigkeit oder die Einheit der Gemeinschaft bedeutet (vgl. hierzu: EGMR (GK), Sindicatul "Pastorul cel Bun" v. Rumänien, Urteil vom 9. Juli 2013, Nr. 2330/09, § 165; EGMR (GK), Fernández Martínez v. Spanien, Urteil vom 12. Juni 2014, Nr. 56030/07, § 128).
Da den Staat insoweit hinsichtlich beider Konventionsrechte objektive Schutzpflichten treffen und der Schutz der einen Rechtsposition notwendigerweise zur Beeinträchtigung des entgegenstehenden Rechts führt, räumt der Europäische Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte den Konventionsstaaten einen weiten Einschätzungsspielraum ein (vgl. EGMR (GK), Sindicatul "Pastorul cel Bun" v. Rumänien, Urteil vom 9. Juli 2013, Nr. 2330/09, § 160; EGMR (GK), Fernández Martínez v. Spanien, Urteil vom 12. Juni 2014, Nr. 56030/07, § 123).
Dennoch werden die Konventionsstaaten ihren objektiven Schutzpflichten im Einzelfall nur gerecht, wenn sie eine eingehende und alle wesentlichen Umstände des Einzelfalls berücksichtigende Abwägung der durch die Kündigung tangierten Rechtspositionen von Arbeitgeber und Arbeitnehmer vornehmen (vgl. EGMR (GK), Sindicatul "Pastorul cel Bun" v. Rumänien, Urteil vom 9. Juli 2013, Nr. 2330/09, § 159; EGMR (GK), Fernández Martínez v. Spanien, Urteil vom 12. Juni 2014, Nr. 56030/07, § 123).
- BVerfG, 11.07.2017 - 1 BvR 1571/15
Das Tarifeinheitsgesetz ist weitgehend mit dem Grundgesetz vereinbar
Es besteht kein Anspruch einer Gewerkschaft auf spezielle Maßnahmen (vgl. EGMR (GK), Sindicatul "Pastorul cel Bun" v. Romania, Entscheidung vom 9. Juli 2013, Nr. 2330/09, § 134). - Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 09.11.2017 - C-414/16
Nach Ansicht von Generalanwalt Tanchev unterliegen berufliche Anforderungen, die …
Vgl. z. B. EGMR, 9. Juli 2013, Sindicatul "Pastorul cel Bun" / Rumänien, CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD000233009, § 136.117 EGMR, 9. Juli 2013, Sindicatul "Pastorul cel Bun"/Rumänien, CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD000233009, § 136.
124 EGMR, 9. Juli 2013, Sindicatul "Pastorul cel Bun"/Rumänien , CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD000233009 , § 136.
127 EGMR, 9. Juli 2013, Sindicatul "Pastorul cel Bun"/Rumänien, CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD000233009, §§ 165 und 166.