Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 33860/03   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2013,15471
EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 33860/03 (https://dejure.org/2013,15471)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 09.07.2013 - 33860/03 (https://dejure.org/2013,15471)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 09. Juli 2013 - 33860/03 (https://dejure.org/2013,15471)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,15471) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    BOZDEMIR AND YESILMEN v. TURKEY

    Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 MRK
    No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) No violation of Article 5 - Right ...

Sonstiges

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

  • EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94

    TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 33860/03
    The Court notes in this connection that it has recorded deficiencies relating to entries in custody logbooks in previous cases (see Ahmet Özkan and Others v. Turkey, no. 21689/93, § 206, 6 April 2004; Tepe v. Turkey, no. 27244/95, § 148, 9 May 2003; Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 105, ECHR 2000-VI; Ä°rfan Bilgin v. Turkey, no. 25659/94, § 130, ECHR 2001-VIII; Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 105, ECHR 1999-IV; Çiçek v. Turkey, no. 25704/94, §§ 137-138, 27 February 2001; Orhan, cited above, § 313; and OsmanoÄ?lu v. Turkey, no. 48804/99, § 48, 24 January 2008).
  • EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 25704/94

    CICEK v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 33860/03
    The Court notes in this connection that it has recorded deficiencies relating to entries in custody logbooks in previous cases (see Ahmet Özkan and Others v. Turkey, no. 21689/93, § 206, 6 April 2004; Tepe v. Turkey, no. 27244/95, § 148, 9 May 2003; Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 105, ECHR 2000-VI; Ä°rfan Bilgin v. Turkey, no. 25659/94, § 130, ECHR 2001-VIII; Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 105, ECHR 1999-IV; Çiçek v. Turkey, no. 25704/94, §§ 137-138, 27 February 2001; Orhan, cited above, § 313; and OsmanoÄ?lu v. Turkey, no. 48804/99, § 48, 24 January 2008).
  • EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94

    AVSAR c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 33860/03
    The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human rights requires that these provisions be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 390, ECHR 2001-VII (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 17.07.2001 - 25659/94

    I. BILGIN v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 33860/03
    The Court notes in this connection that it has recorded deficiencies relating to entries in custody logbooks in previous cases (see Ahmet Özkan and Others v. Turkey, no. 21689/93, § 206, 6 April 2004; Tepe v. Turkey, no. 27244/95, § 148, 9 May 2003; Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 105, ECHR 2000-VI; Ä°rfan Bilgin v. Turkey, no. 25659/94, § 130, ECHR 2001-VIII; Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 105, ECHR 1999-IV; Çiçek v. Turkey, no. 25704/94, §§ 137-138, 27 February 2001; Orhan, cited above, § 313; and OsmanoÄ?lu v. Turkey, no. 48804/99, § 48, 24 January 2008).
  • EGMR, 09.05.2003 - 27244/95

    TEPE v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 33860/03
    The Court notes in this connection that it has recorded deficiencies relating to entries in custody logbooks in previous cases (see Ahmet Özkan and Others v. Turkey, no. 21689/93, § 206, 6 April 2004; Tepe v. Turkey, no. 27244/95, § 148, 9 May 2003; Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 105, ECHR 2000-VI; Ä°rfan Bilgin v. Turkey, no. 25659/94, § 130, ECHR 2001-VIII; Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 105, ECHR 1999-IV; Çiçek v. Turkey, no. 25704/94, §§ 137-138, 27 February 2001; Orhan, cited above, § 313; and OsmanoÄ?lu v. Turkey, no. 48804/99, § 48, 24 January 2008).
  • EGMR, 06.04.2004 - 21689/93

    AHMET ÖZKAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 33860/03
    The Court notes in this connection that it has recorded deficiencies relating to entries in custody logbooks in previous cases (see Ahmet Özkan and Others v. Turkey, no. 21689/93, § 206, 6 April 2004; Tepe v. Turkey, no. 27244/95, § 148, 9 May 2003; Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 105, ECHR 2000-VI; Ä°rfan Bilgin v. Turkey, no. 25659/94, § 130, ECHR 2001-VIII; Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 105, ECHR 1999-IV; Çiçek v. Turkey, no. 25704/94, §§ 137-138, 27 February 2001; Orhan, cited above, § 313; and OsmanoÄ?lu v. Turkey, no. 48804/99, § 48, 24 January 2008).
  • EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23657/94

    ÇAKICI v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 33860/03
    The Court notes in this connection that it has recorded deficiencies relating to entries in custody logbooks in previous cases (see Ahmet Özkan and Others v. Turkey, no. 21689/93, § 206, 6 April 2004; Tepe v. Turkey, no. 27244/95, § 148, 9 May 2003; Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 105, ECHR 2000-VI; Ä°rfan Bilgin v. Turkey, no. 25659/94, § 130, ECHR 2001-VIII; Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 105, ECHR 1999-IV; Çiçek v. Turkey, no. 25704/94, §§ 137-138, 27 February 2001; Orhan, cited above, § 313; and OsmanoÄ?lu v. Turkey, no. 48804/99, § 48, 24 January 2008).
  • EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

    RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 33860/03
    Failing this, a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Çolak and Filizer v. Turkey, nos. 32578/96 and 32579/96, § 30, 8 January 2004; Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V; Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, § 61, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI; and Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 34 Series A no. 336).
  • EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 74010/11

    DEMBELE c. SUISSE

    Il y a quelques semaines, la Cour (dans la même composition) a rejeté une allégation concernant un traitement contraire à l'article 3 sur la base du raisonnement suivant: « (...) aucun témoignage oculaire indépendant ne vient corroborer les allégations des requérantes'(Bozdemir et Yeslimen c. Turquie, no 33860/03, § 55, 9 juillet 2013)[1].
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht