Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 09.09.2021 - 7859/18, 12181/18 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2021,39385) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GILFANOV AND AMIROV v. RUSSIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.09.2021 - 7859/18
According to its established case-law, proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see, for example, Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 121, 10 January 2012). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.09.2021 - 7859/18
Even though, the burden of proof may, under certain circumstances, be shifted to the authorities (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII, and Mathew v. the Netherlands, no. 24919/03, § 156, ECHR 2005 IX), an applicant must, nevertheless, provide an elaborate and consistent account of the State's alleged failure to provide him with the appropriate conditions of detention and required medical assistance, mentioning the specific elements which would enable the Court to determine that the complaint is not manifestly ill-founded or inadmissible on any other grounds (see Ananyev and Others, cited above, § 122).