Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ÇOSELAV v. TURKEY

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Çoselav v. Turkey

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 16.04.2002 - 37971/97

  STES COLAS EST AND OTHERS v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 1413/07

  In response to the Government's argument concerning the costs and expenses relating to the proceedings at the national level, the Court reiterates that, if it finds that there has been a violation of the Convention, it may award the applicant the costs and expenses incurred before the domestic courts for the prevention or redress of the violation (see Société Colas Est and Others v. France, no. 37971/97, § 56, ECHR 2002-III, and the cases cited therein).
• EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 53924/00

  Schutz des ungeborenen Lebens durch EMRK - Schwangerschaftsabbruch nach …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 1413/07

  The Court reiterates that, if the infringement of the right to life or to physical integrity is not caused intentionally, the positive obligation to set up an "effective judicial system" does not necessarily require criminal proceedings to be brought in every case and might be satisfied if civil, administrative or even disciplinary remedies were available to the victims (see, for example, Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703/97, §§ 90, 94 and 95, ECHR 2002-VIII,and Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VII).
• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 1413/07

  The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings requires that Article 2 of the Convention be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 146-47, Series A no. 324).

 
• EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99

  PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 1413/07

  The Court reiterates that where lives have been lost in circumstances potentially engaging the responsibility of the State, Article 2 of the Convention entails a duty for the State to ensure, by all means at its disposal, an adequate response - judicial or otherwise - so that the legislative and administrative framework set up to protect the right to life is properly implemented and any breaches of that right are repressed and punished (see Öneryıldız v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, § 91, ECHR 2004-XII, and Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 54, ECHR 2002-II).
• EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 9296/06

  SHUMKOVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 1413/07

  What an effective investigation in this context entails was recently summarised by the Court in its judgment in the case of Shumkova v. Russia (no. 9296/06, §§ 106-109, 14 February 2012).
• EGMR, 24.10.2002 - 37703/97

  Verantwortung des Staates für Mord durch beurlaubte Gefangene; Verpflichtung des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 1413/07

  The Court reiterates that, if the infringement of the right to life or to physical integrity is not caused intentionally, the positive obligation to set up an "effective judicial system" does not necessarily require criminal proceedings to be brought in every case and might be satisfied if civil, administrative or even disciplinary remedies were available to the victims (see, for example, Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703/97, §§ 90, 94 and 95, ECHR 2002-VIII,and Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VII).
• EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 70337/01

  GÜVEÇ c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 1413/07

  The Court concluded, in that judgment, that the detention of the applicant in a prison with adults had increased his psychological problems which, in turn, had led to his repeated attempts to take his own life (no. 70337/01, § 92, ECHR 2009 (extracts)).

• EGMR, 20.05.2021 - 13527/18

  LAPSHIN v. AZERBAIJAN

  It is incumbent on the State to account for any injuries suffered in custody, an obligation which is particularly stringent when an individual dies (see, for example, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 99, ECHR 2000-VII; Shumkova v. Russia, no. 9296/06, § 89, 14 February 2012; and Çoselav v. Turkey, no. 1413/07, § 53, 9 October 2012).
• EGMR, 12.03.2019 - 52538/09

  TASDEMIR v. TURKEY

  S'agissant spécifiquement de l'objet de la présente requête, la Cour a déjà, dans un certain nombre de ses arrêts, examiné des allégations de défaut de protection du droit à la vie à l'égard de détenus en Turquie (voir, entre autres, Kilavuz c. Turquie, no 8327/03, §§ 87-97, 21 octobre 2008, et Ço?Ÿelav c. Turquie, no 1413/07, § 53, 9 octobre 2012).
• EGMR, 04.05.2017 - 47095/09

  MUSTAFAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  It is incumbent on the State to account for any injuries suffered in custody, an obligation which is particularly stringent when an individual dies (see, for example, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 99, ECHR 2000-VII; Shumkova v. Russia, no. 9296/06, § 89, 14 February 2012; and Çoselav v. Turkey, no. 1413/07, § 53, 9 October 2012).
• EGMR, 10.09.2020 - 69460/12

  SHURIYYA ZEYNALOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  It is incumbent on the State to account for any injuries suffered in custody, an obligation which is particularly stringent when an individual dies (see, for example, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 99, ECHR 2000-VII; Shumkova v. Russia, no. 9296/06, § 89, 14 February 2012; and Çoselav v. Turkey, no. 1413/07, § 53, 9 October 2012).
• EGMR, 04.06.2020 - 50988/13

  CITRARO ET MOLINO c. ITALIE

  Toutefois, cet élément ne saurait venir compenser le fait qu'aucune autre décision ou mesure raisonnable n'a été prise par les autorités pour réduire le risque de suicide, comme le transfert dans une autre cellule dotée d'un éclairage fonctionnel, le nettoyage des lieux ou la mise en place de consultations fréquentes avec le psychiatre (Çoselav c. Turquie, no 1413/07, § 62, 9 octobre 2012).