Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 09.10.2018 - 29593/17 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,31689) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CORALLO v. THE NETHERLANDS
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
CORALLO v. THE NETHERLANDS
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9990/82
BOZANO v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2018 - 29593/17
Taking into account these circumstances, the Court has found no evidence indicating any arbitrariness in respect of the applicant's detention pending extradition, or, more particularly, bad faith, deception or unjustified delays in respect of the authorities" conduct (see, a contrario, Bozano v. France, 18 December 1986, § 60, Series A no. 111, and Conka v. Belgium, no. 51564/99, § 41, ECHR 2002-I). - EGMR, 10.02.1995 - 15175/89
ALLENET DE RIBEMONT c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2018 - 29593/17
In so far as the applicant alleges a violation of Article 6 § 2 of the Convention, which guarantees the right to the presumption of innocence, the Court reiterates that this right is one of the elements of a fair criminal trial guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 (see Allenet de Ribemont v. France, 10 February 1995, § 35, Series A no. 308, and Natsvlishvili and Togonidze v. Georgia, no. 9043/05, § 103, ECHR 2014 (extracts)). - EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2018 - 29593/17
It reiterates in particular that a serious lack of space in a prison cell weighs heavily as a factor to be taken into account for the purpose of establishing whether the detention conditions described are "degrading" from the point of view of Article 3 and may disclose a violation, both alone or taken together with other shortcomings (see Mur?.ic, cited above, §§ 122 and 141, and Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 149, 10 January 2012). - EGMR, 29.04.2014 - 9043/05
NATSVLISHVILI AND TOGONIDZE v. GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.10.2018 - 29593/17
In so far as the applicant alleges a violation of Article 6 § 2 of the Convention, which guarantees the right to the presumption of innocence, the Court reiterates that this right is one of the elements of a fair criminal trial guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 (see Allenet de Ribemont v. France, 10 February 1995, § 35, Series A no. 308, and Natsvlishvili and Togonidze v. Georgia, no. 9043/05, § 103, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).