Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 09.11.2004 - 30103/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,51211) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MAGLODI v. HUNGARY
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 5-3 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 25.11.2003 - 30103/02
- EGMR, 09.11.2004 - 30103/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2004 - 30103/02
Continued detention can be justified in a given case only if there are specific indications of a genuine requirement of public interest which, notwithstanding the presumption of innocence, outweighs the rule of respect for individual liberty laid down in Article 5 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, §§ 152 et seq., ECHR 2000-IV). - EGMR, 28.03.1990 - 11968/86
B. ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2004 - 30103/02
In respect of the period between 11 June 2003 and 5 May 2004, the Court reiterates that, in view of the essential link between Article 5 § 3 of the Convention and paragraph 1 (c) of that Article, a person convicted at first instance cannot be regarded as being detained "for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority on reasonable suspicion of having committed an offence", as specified in the latter provision, but is in the position provided for by Article 5 § 1 (a), which authorises deprivation of liberty "after conviction by a competent court" (see, for example, B. v. Austria, judgment of 28 March 1990, Series A no. 175, pp. 14-16, §§ 36-39).