Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  STOJAKOVIC v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - claim dismissed Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 30003/02
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 30003/02

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89

  SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 30003/02

  The Court has accepted such exceptional circumstances in cases where proceedings concerned exclusively legal or highly technical questions (see Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, judgment of 24 June 1993, Series A no. 263, p. 19-20, § 58; Varela Assalino v. Portugal (dec.), no. 64336/01, 25 April 2002; Speil v. Austria (dec.) no. 42057/98, 5 September 2002).
• EGMR, 23.02.1994 - 18928/91

  FREDIN c. SUÈDE (N° 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 30003/02

  The Court further notes that, according to its established case-law, the applicant was in principle entitled to a hearing before the first and only tribunal examining his case, unless there were exceptional circumstances which justified dispensing with such a hearing (see, for instance, Fredin v. Sweden (no.2), judgment of 23 February 1994, Series A no. 283-A, pp.
• EGMR, 29.04.1988 - 10328/83

  BELILOS v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 30003/02

  It must also satisfy a series of further requirements - independence, in particular of the executive; impartiality; duration of its members' terms of office; guarantees afforded by its procedure - several of which appear in the text of Article 6 § 1 itself (see Baischer v. Austria, no. 32381/96, § 23, 20 December 2001 with a reference to Belilos v. Switzerland, judgment of 29 April 1988, Series A no. 132, p. 29, § 64).
• EGMR, 25.11.1994 - 12884/87

  ORTENBERG c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 30003/02

  Furthermore, the Constitutional Court, dealing with the applicant's case at last instance, does not have, in the circumstances, the required scope of review in order to constitute a "tribunal" within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Zumtobel v. Austria judgement of 21 September 1993, Series A no 268-A, p. 13, § 30, and Ortenberg v. Austria, judgement of 25 November 1994, Series A no. 295-B, p.50, § 32).
• EGMR, 08.12.1999 - 28541/95

  PELLEGRIN v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 30003/02

  Referring to the Pellegrin case (Pellegrin v. France [GC], no. 28541/95, §§ 64, 66, ECHR 1999-VIII), the Government argued that Article 6 does not apply to the impugned proceedings.

• EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 10781/08

  OHNEBERG v. AUSTRIA

  The applicant, referring to the Eskelinen case (cited above) and the Stojakovic case (Stojakovic v. Austria, no. 30003/02, 9 November 2006), asserted that Article 6 of the Convention was applicable to the present case.
• EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 12377/03

  KABKOV v. RUSSIA

  Moreover, the outcome of the proceedings must be directly decisive for the civil right in question (see, among others, Stojakovic v. Austria, no. 30003/02, § 38, 9 November 2006, and Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 27, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 31556/03

  EFENDIYEVA v. AZERBAIJAN

  Moreover, the outcome of the proceedings must be directly decisive for the civil right in question (see, for example, Stojakovic v. Austria, no. 30003/02, § 38, 9 November 2006, and Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 27, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 33343/03

  TARVERDIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Moreover, the outcome of the proceedings must be directly decisive for the civil right in question (see, for example, Stojakovic v. Austria, no. 30003/02, § 38, 9 November 2006, and Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 27, ECHR 2000-VII).