Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BELUKHA v. UKRAINE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 6-1 No violation of Art. 6-1 (length) Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - ...

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 33949/02

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 33949/02

  The Court considers that this complaint falls to be examined under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which contains an inherent right of access to a court and is, in this respect, to be considered as constituting a lex specialis in relation to Article 13 of the Convention (see, inter alia, Golder v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, pp. 16-18, §§ 34 et seq.; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 146 et seq., ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 26.10.1984 - 9186/80

  DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 33949/02

  In this respect even appearances may be of a certain importance or, in other words, "justice must not only be done, it must also be seen to be done" (see De Cubber v. Belgium, judgment of 26 October 1984, Series A no. 86, p. 14, § 26).
• EGMR, 21.12.2000 - 33958/96

  WETTSTEIN v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 33949/02

  According to the Court's constant case-law, the existence of impartiality for the purposes of Article 6 § 1 must be determined according to a subjective test where regard must be had to the personal conviction and behaviour of a particular judge, that is, whether the judge held any personal prejudice or bias in a given case; and also according to an objective test, that is to say by ascertaining whether the tribunal itself and, among other aspects, its composition, offered sufficient guarantees to exclude any legitimate doubt in respect of its impartiality (see, inter alia, Fey v. Austria, judgment of 24 February 1993, Series A no. 255, p. 12, §§ 27, 28 and 30; Wettstein v. Switzerland, no. 33958/96, § 42, ECHR 2000-XII).

• EGMR, 26.09.2023 - 4465/18

  MOLCHANOVA v. UKRAINE

  The proceedings in the applicant's case therefore lasted slightly more than two years and six months at two levels of jurisdiction, ending on 18 June 2020, which cannot be regarded as unreasonable (see, among many others, Belukha v. Ukraine, no. 33949/02, § 66, 9 November 2006).