Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KRYSTYNA MISIAK AND JAN MISIAK v. POLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 31193/04

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities, and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 31193/04

  However, the "effectiveness" of a "remedy" within the meaning of that provision does not depend on the certainty of a favourable outcome for the applicant (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 154 et seq., ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03

  CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 31193/04

  The relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for the excessive length of judicial proceedings, in particular the provisions of the 2004 Act as applicable at the material time, are set out in the Court's decisions in cases of Charzynski v. Poland no. 15212/03 (dec.), §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V and Ratajczyk v. Poland no. 11215/02 (dec.), ECHR 2005-VIII and its judgment in the case of Krasuski v. Poland, no. 61444/00, §§ 34-46, ECHR 2005-V.
• EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78

  Eckle ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 31193/04

  A decision or measure favourable to the applicant is not in principle sufficient to deprive him of his status as a "victim" for the purposes of Article 34 of the Convention unless the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention (see, inter alia, Eckle v. Germany, judgment of 15 July 1982, § 66, Series A no. 51, p. 30; Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI; and Siliadin, cited above, § 62).

• EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 4955/09

  ZAGANCZYK v. POLAND

  The Court recalls that it has found both a complaint under section 5 of the 2004 Act and an action for damages under section 16 of the 2004 Act in conjunction with Article 417 of the Civil Code to be effective remedies in respect of grievances of excessive length of judicial proceedings depending on the stage of the domestic proceedings (see, Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, § 36-42, ECHR 2005-V; Krasuski v. Poland, no. 61444/00, § 72, ECHR 2005-V (extracts); Krystyna Misiak and Jan Misiak v. Poland, no. 31193/04, § 123, 11 April 2011).