Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SALAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 5-1 (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76

  GUZZARDI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 40900/05

  In this connection, the Court reiterates that, in order to determine whether there has been a deprivation of liberty, the starting point must be the specific situation of the individual concerned, and account must be taken of a whole range of factors arising in a particular case, such as the type, duration, effects and manner of implementation of the measure in question (see Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, § 92, Series A no. 39).
• EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9990/82

  BOZANO v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 40900/05

  What is at stake here is not only the "right to liberty" but also the "right to security of person" (see, among other authorities, Bozano v. France, 18 December 1986, § 54, Series A no. 111, and Wassink v. the Netherlands, 27 September 1990, § 24, Series A no. 185-A).
• EGMR, 24.06.1982 - 7906/77

  VAN DROOGENBROECK v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 40900/05

  The Court must look behind appearances and investigate the realities of the situation complained of (see Van Droogenbroeck v. Belgium, 24 June 1982, § 38, Series A no. 50).

• EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 41872/10

  M.A. c. CHYPRE

  Jusqu'à présent, ce but a été pris en compte seulement à un stade ultérieur de l'analyse, en vue de l'examen de la compatibilité de la privation de liberté avec l'article 5 § 1 de la Convention (Creanga, § 93, précité, Osypenko c. Ukraine, no 4634/04, §§ 51-65, 9 novembre 2010, Salayev c. Azerbaïdjan, no 40900/05, §§ 41-42, 9 novembre 2010, Iliya Stefanov c. Bulgarie, no 65755/01, § 71, 22 mai 2008, et Soare et autres c. Roumanie, no 24329/02, § 234, 22 février 2011).
• EGMR, 02.12.2014 - 58904/08

  GAFAROV v. AZERBAIJAN

  The relevant provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure ("the CCrP") concerning arrest on suspicion of having committed a criminal offence are described in detail in the Court's judgments in Farhad Aliyev v. Azerbaijan (no. 37138/06, §§ 84-88, 9 November 2010) and Salayev v. Azerbaijan (no. 40900/05, §§ 25-29, 9 November 2010).

  Turning to the circumstances of the present case, the Court notes that it has already found in similar cases against Azerbaijan that raising a complaint of detention in excess of the maximum forty-eight-hour period when the arrested person appeared for the first time before a judge constituted an effective remedy to be exhausted before lodging such a complaint with the Court (see Farhad Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 37138/06, §§ 154-69, 9 November 2010, and Salayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 40900/05, §§ 34-48, 9 November 2010).

• EGMR, 15.03.2016 - 76672/12

  HOALGA ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE

  Eu égard aux circonstances de l'interpellation des requérants, au fait qu'ils ont été conduits à l'intérieur du poste de gendarmerie après avoir été immobilisés et menottés, qu'ils y sont demeurés dans le cadre des mesures préalables à des poursuites pénales pour délit d'outrage, ainsi qu'au fait qu'ils n'ont pas pu prendre contact avec leurs familles se trouvant à l'extérieur du poste, la Cour estime qu'il serait irréaliste de considérer que les requérants étaient libres de quitter le poste à leur gré (voir, mutatis mutandis, I.I. c. Bulgarie, no 44082/98, § 87, 9 juin 2005 ; Salayev c. Azerbaïdjan, no 40900/05, § 42, 9 novembre 2010, et Osypenko précité, § 49).

 
• EGMR, 19.07.2016 - 32013/07

  POPOV v. RUSSIA

  Once it has been established that the applicant was not free to leave the station, the issue of whether he arrived there voluntarily or was taken there, which was also raised by the respondent Government, becomes immaterial (see Salayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 40900/05, § 42, 9 November 2010, and I.I. v. Bulgaria, no. 44082/98, § 86, 9 June 2005).
• EGMR, 30.04.2013 - 16206/06

  BERIDZE v. GEORGIA

  In this regard, the Court notes that there already exists a well-established case-law concerning complaints about the unlawfulness of the initial period of detention without a court order (see Salayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 40900/05, §§ 44-48, 9 November 2010; Farhad Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 37138/06, §§ 166-169, 9 November 2010, and Osypenko v. Ukraine, no. 4634/04, § 49, 9 November 2010).
• EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 17715/12

  ZHARINOVA v. RUSSIA

  Considering that the applicant was taken to the police station against her will and could not leave it until she was allowed to do so by the officers, the four and a half hours' stay at the station constituted a deprivation of liberty within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention (see Salayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 40900/05, § 43, 9 November 2010).