Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 16798/90   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1994,11842
EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 16798/90 (https://dejure.org/1994,11842)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 09.12.1994 - 16798/90 (https://dejure.org/1994,11842)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 09. Dezember 1994 - 16798/90 (https://dejure.org/1994,11842)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1994,11842) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    LÓPEZ OSTRA c. ESPAGNE

    Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 34 MRK
    Exception préliminaire rejetée (non-épuisement) Exception préliminaire rejetée (victime) Violation de l'Art. 8 Non-violation de l'Art. 3 Dommage matériel - réparation pécuniaire Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    LÓPEZ OSTRA v. SPAIN

    Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 34 MRK
    Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion) Preliminary objection rejected (victim) Violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 3 Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...

  • Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte PDF
  • juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (132)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

  • EGMR, 19.12.1990 - 11444/85

    DELTA c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 16798/90
    Mr Mazón Costa cannot rely on Article 50 (art. 50) to claim just satisfaction on his own account as he accepted the terms of the legal aid granted to his client (see, among other authorities, the Delta v. France judgment of 19 December 1990, Series A no. 191-A, p. 18, para. 47).
  • EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74

    MARCKX v. BELGIUM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 16798/90
    At all events, if the applicant could now return to her former home following the decision to close the plant, this would be a factor to be taken into account in assessing the damage she sustained but would not mean that she ceased to be a victim (see, among many other authorities, the Marckx v. Belgium judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, pp. 13-14, para. 27, and the Inze v. Austria judgment of 28 October 1987, Series A no. 126, p. 16, para. 32).
  • EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76

    GUZZARDI v. ITALY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 16798/90
    The applicant therefore provided the national courts with the opportunity which is in principle intended to be afforded to Contracting States by Article 26 (art. 26) of the Convention, namely the opportunity of putting right the violations alleged against them (see, inter alia, the De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium judgment of 18 June 1971, Series A no. 12, p. 29, para. 50, and the Guzzardi v. Italy judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39, p. 27, para. 72).
     
  • EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 1936/63

    Neumeister ./. Österreich

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 16798/90
    Where a situation under consideration is a persisting one, the Court may take into account facts occurring after the application has been lodged and even after the decision on admissibility has been adopted (see, as the earliest authority, the Neumeister v. Austria judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 8, p. 21, para. 28, and p. 38, para. 7).
  • EGMR, 28.10.1987 - 8695/79

    Inze ./. Österreich

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 16798/90
    At all events, if the applicant could now return to her former home following the decision to close the plant, this would be a factor to be taken into account in assessing the damage she sustained but would not mean that she ceased to be a victim (see, among many other authorities, the Marckx v. Belgium judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, pp. 13-14, para. 27, and the Inze v. Austria judgment of 28 October 1987, Series A no. 126, p. 16, para. 32).
  • EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81

    POWELL ET RAYNER c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 16798/90
    Furthermore, even in relation to the positive obligations flowing from the first paragraph of Article 8 (art. 8-1), in striking the required balance the aims mentioned in the second paragraph (art. 8-2) may be of a certain relevance (see, in particular, the Rees v. the United Kingdom judgment of 17 October 1986, Series A no. 106, p. 15, para. 37, and the Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, p. 18, para. 41).
  • EGMR, 17.10.1986 - 9532/81

    REES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 16798/90
    Furthermore, even in relation to the positive obligations flowing from the first paragraph of Article 8 (art. 8-1), in striking the required balance the aims mentioned in the second paragraph (art. 8-2) may be of a certain relevance (see, in particular, the Rees v. the United Kingdom judgment of 17 October 1986, Series A no. 106, p. 15, para. 37, and the Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, p. 18, para. 41).
  • EGMR, 24.02.1994 - 15450/89

    CASADO COCA v. SPAIN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 16798/90
    The Court has consistently held that it is primarily for the national authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply domestic law (see, inter alia, the Casado Coca v. Spain judgment of 24 February 1994, Series A no. 285-A, p. 18, para. 43).
  • EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 9300/07

    Herrmann ./. Deutschland

    Lopez Ostra./. Spanien, 9. Dezember 1994, Rdnr. 51, Serie A Band 303-C, und Guerra und andere./. Italien, 19. Februar 1998, Rdnr. 60, Urteils- und Entscheidungssammlung 1998-I.
  • EGMR, 08.07.2003 - 36022/97

    HATTON ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

    De même, dans l'affaire López Ostra c. Espagne (arrêt du 9 décembre 1994, série A no 303-C, pp. 54-55, § 51), la Cour a déclaré que l'article 8 pouvait inclure un droit à être protégé contre des atteintes graves à l'environnement car celles-ci pouvaient « affecter le bien-être d'une personne et la priver de la jouissance de son domicile de manière à nuire à sa vie privée et familiale, sans pour autant mettre en grave danger la santé de l'intéressée ".

    La Cour a confirmé avec netteté que la Convention garantissait, sous l'article 8, 1e droit à un environnement sain: elle a conclu, les deux fois à l'unanimité, à la violation de l'article 8, dans les affaires López Ostra c. Espagne (arrêt du 9 décembre 1994, série A no 303-C) et Guerra et autres c. Italie (arrêt du 19 février 1998, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1998-I).

  • EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 15339/02

    BUDAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    In assessing whether the respondent State had complied with the positive obligation, the Court must consider the particular circumstances of the case, regard being had, among other elements, to the domestic legality of the authorities' acts or omissions (see López Ostra v. Spain, judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 303-C, pp. 46-47, §§ 16-22, and Guerra and Others v. Italy, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, p. 219, §§ 25-27), the domestic decision-making process, including the appropriate investigations and studies, and the complexity of the issue, especially where conflicting Convention interests are involved (see Hatton and others, cited above, § 128, and Fadeyeva, cited above, §§ 96-98).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht