Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 09.12.2004 - 12877/02 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ZOVANOVIC v. CROATIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - claim dismissed Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 09.01.2003 - 12877/02
- EGMR, 09.12.2004 - 12877/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 01.03.2002 - 48778/99
KUTIC v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2004 - 12877/02
Accordingly, the Court does have competence ratione temporis to examine the application in so far as it concerns the stay on the applicant's proceedings after 5 November 1997, due account being taken of the length of time they had been stayed prior to ratification (see Kutic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 48778/99, 4 October 2001).The Court finds, in accordance with its case-law (see, inter alia, Kutic v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, § 33, ECHR 2002-II, and Multiplex v. Croatia, no. 58112/00, § 55, 10 July 2003), that the long period for which the applicant was prevented from having his civil claim determined by domestic courts as a consequence of a legislative measure constitutes a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
- EGMR, 10.07.2003 - 58112/00
MULTIPLEX v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2004 - 12877/02
The Court finds, in accordance with its case-law (see, inter alia, Kutic v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, § 33, ECHR 2002-II, and Multiplex v. Croatia, no. 58112/00, § 55, 10 July 2003), that the long period for which the applicant was prevented from having his civil claim determined by domestic courts as a consequence of a legislative measure constitutes a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.