Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 09.12.2004 - 20510/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,60439) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VAN THUIL v. THE NETHERLANDS
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 6, Art. 13 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 30.03.1989 - 10444/83
LAMY c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2004 - 20510/02
Given the Court's finding in its judgment in the case of Lamy v. Belgium (judgment of 30 March 1989, Series A no. 151), this must be regarded as being contrary to Article 5 of the Convention.He relies in this respect on the Court's judgment in the case of Lamy v. Belgium (judgment of 30 March 1989, Series A no. 151).
- EGMR, 28.11.2000 - 29462/95
REHBOCK c. SLOVENIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2004 - 20510/02
The requirement of speed under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention is to be determined in the light of the circumstances of each case (see Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, § 84, ECHR 2000-XII; M.B. v. Switzerland, no. 28256/95, § 37, 30 November 2000; and Samy v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 36499/97, 4 December 2001). - EGMR, 30.11.2000 - 28256/95
M.B. v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2004 - 20510/02
The requirement of speed under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention is to be determined in the light of the circumstances of each case (see Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, § 84, ECHR 2000-XII; M.B. v. Switzerland, no. 28256/95, § 37, 30 November 2000; and Samy v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 36499/97, 4 December 2001). - EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 32605/96
RUTTEN v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2004 - 20510/02
Although Article 5 § 4 of the Convention does not guarantee a right of appeal against an unsuccessful review, it follows from the aim and purpose of this provision that its requirements must still be respected if an appeal procedure is available (see Rutten v. the Netherlands, no. 32605/96, § 53, 24 July 2001). - EGMR, 16.10.2001 - 37555/97
O'HARA c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2004 - 20510/02
Thus facts which raise a suspicion need not be of the same level as those necessary to justify a conviction, or even the bringing of a criminal charge (see O'Hara v. the United Kingdom, no. 37555/97, §§ 34 and 36 with further references, ECHR 2001-X).
- EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 13275/03
MIHUTA c. ROUMANIE
Ce recours offre à l'intéressé des garanties supplémentaires afin d'évaluer la nécessité de prolonger la détention provisoire (Van Thuil c. Pays Bas (déc.), no 20510/02, 9 décembre 2004) et il doit aboutir, à bref délai, à une décision judiciaire mettant fin à la détention si elle se révèle illégale (Baranowski c. Pologne, no 28358/95, § 68, CEDH 2000-III).