Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 11976/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,51016) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DEMIREL AND ATES (NO. 3) v. TURKEY
(englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (6) Neu Zitiert selbst (13)
- EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 10037/03
DEMIREL ET ATES c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 11976/03
10037/03 and 14813/03, 12 April 2007; and Demirel and Ates v. Turkey (no. 2), cited above).The Court observes that it has previously examined and rejected the applicants" grievances of this kind (see Demirel and Ates v. Turkey (dec.), no. 10037/03 and 14813/03, 9 February 2006).
- EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 29183/95
FRESSOZ ET ROIRE c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 11976/03
The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning Article 10 (see, in particular, the following judgments: Sener v. Turkey, no. 26680/95, §§ 39-43, 18 July 2000; Fressoz and Roire v. France ([GC], no. 29183/95, § 45, ECHR 1999-I; Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, §§ 41-42, Series A no. 103; and ErdoÄ?du v. Turkey, no. 25723/94, §§ 51-53, ECHR 2000-VI). - EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21980/93
BLADET TROMSØ ET STENSAAS c. NORVEGE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 11976/03
Not only does the press have the task of imparting such information and ideas: the public also has a right to receive them (see Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 62, ECHR 1999-III).
- EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23168/94
KARATAS c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 11976/03
Moreover, the Court also takes into account the background to the case submitted to it, particularly problems linked to the prevention of terrorism (see Karatas v. Turkey [GC], no. 23168/94, § 51, ECHR 1999-IV). - EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23927/94
SÜREK AND ÖZDEMIR v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 11976/03
The Court observes that it has examined a number of cases, two of which were brought by the same applicants, raising similar issues to those in the present case and found a violation of Article 10 of the Convention (see, in particular, Sürek and Özdemir v. Turkey [GC], nos. 23927/94 and 24277/94, 8 July 1999; Özgür Gündem v. Turkey, no. 23144/93, §§ 63-64, ECHR 2000-III; Korkmaz v. Turkey (no. 1), no. 40987/98, 20 December 2005; Korkmaz v. Turkey (no. 3), no. 42590/98, 20 December 2005; Halis DoÄ?an v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 71984/01, 25 July 2006; Karakoyun and Turan v. Turkey, no. 18482/03, 11 December 2007; Demirel and Ates v. Turkey, nos. - EGMR, 16.03.2000 - 23144/93
OZGUR GUNDEM c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 11976/03
The Court observes that it has examined a number of cases, two of which were brought by the same applicants, raising similar issues to those in the present case and found a violation of Article 10 of the Convention (see, in particular, Sürek and Özdemir v. Turkey [GC], nos. 23927/94 and 24277/94, 8 July 1999; Özgür Gündem v. Turkey, no. 23144/93, §§ 63-64, ECHR 2000-III; Korkmaz v. Turkey (no. 1), no. 40987/98, 20 December 2005; Korkmaz v. Turkey (no. 3), no. 42590/98, 20 December 2005; Halis DoÄ?an v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 71984/01, 25 July 2006; Karakoyun and Turan v. Turkey, no. 18482/03, 11 December 2007; Demirel and Ates v. Turkey, nos. - EGMR, 15.06.2000 - 25723/94
ERDOGDU c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 11976/03
The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning Article 10 (see, in particular, the following judgments: Sener v. Turkey, no. 26680/95, §§ 39-43, 18 July 2000; Fressoz and Roire v. France ([GC], no. 29183/95, § 45, ECHR 1999-I; Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, §§ 41-42, Series A no. 103; and ErdoÄ?du v. Turkey, no. 25723/94, §§ 51-53, ECHR 2000-VI). - EGMR, 27.05.2003 - 43425/98
Meinungsfreiheit (konstitutive Bedeutung in der Demokratie; Eingriff; …
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 11976/03
In addition, the nature and severity of the penalties imposed are also factors to be considered when assessing the proportionality of the interference (see Skalka v. Poland, no. 43425/98, § 42, 27 May 2003). - EGMR, 20.12.2005 - 40987/98
KORKMAZ c. TURQUIE (N° 1)
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 11976/03
The Court observes that it has examined a number of cases, two of which were brought by the same applicants, raising similar issues to those in the present case and found a violation of Article 10 of the Convention (see, in particular, Sürek and Özdemir v. Turkey [GC], nos. 23927/94 and 24277/94, 8 July 1999; Özgür Gündem v. Turkey, no. 23144/93, §§ 63-64, ECHR 2000-III; Korkmaz v. Turkey (no. 1), no. 40987/98, 20 December 2005; Korkmaz v. Turkey (no. 3), no. 42590/98, 20 December 2005; Halis DoÄ?an v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 71984/01, 25 July 2006; Karakoyun and Turan v. Turkey, no. 18482/03, 11 December 2007; Demirel and Ates v. Turkey, nos. - EGMR, 20.12.2005 - 42590/98
KORKMAZ c. TURQUIE (N° 3)
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 11976/03
The Court observes that it has examined a number of cases, two of which were brought by the same applicants, raising similar issues to those in the present case and found a violation of Article 10 of the Convention (see, in particular, Sürek and Özdemir v. Turkey [GC], nos. 23927/94 and 24277/94, 8 July 1999; Özgür Gündem v. Turkey, no. 23144/93, §§ 63-64, ECHR 2000-III; Korkmaz v. Turkey (no. 1), no. 40987/98, 20 December 2005; Korkmaz v. Turkey (no. 3), no. 42590/98, 20 December 2005; Halis DoÄ?an v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 71984/01, 25 July 2006; Karakoyun and Turan v. Turkey, no. 18482/03, 11 December 2007; Demirel and Ates v. Turkey, nos. - EGMR, 25.07.2006 - 71984/01
HALIS DOGAN c. TURQUIE (N° 2)
- EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 18482/03
KARAKOYUN ET TURAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 18.07.2000 - 26680/95
SENER v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 06.12.2016 - 50171/09
BELGE v. TURKEY
In the Court's view, the applicant's speech as whole cannot be construed as encouraging violence, armed resistance or an uprising (see Demirel and Ates v. Turkey (no. 3), no. 11976/03, § 26, 9 December 2008). - EGMR, 16.01.2018 - 6875/05
SAYGILI AND KARATAS v. TURKEY
In this connection, it notes that, apart from the fines imposed on the applicants, the first-instance court also ordered the temporary closure of the newspaper for a period of seven days, which amounted to veiled censorship and hindered their professional activities (see Demirel and Ates v. Turkey (no. 3), no. 11976/03, § 28, 9 December 2008). - EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 24548/10
BAYAR v. TURKEY
As regards the necessity of the interference in a democratic society, the Court notes that it has already examined similar grievances in a number of other cases and found violations of Article 10 of the Convention (see, for example, Sürek v. Turkey (no. 4) [GC], no. 24762/94, §§ 54-61, 8 July 1999; Erdogdu v. Turkey, no. 25723/94, §§ 60-73, ECHR 2000-VI; Demirel and Ates v. Turkey (no. 3), no. 11976/03, §§ 19-30, 9 December 2008; and Fatih Tas (No.2), cited above, §§ 12-19).
- EGMR, 24.04.2018 - 45281/08
FATIH TAS v. TURKEY (No. 3)
- EGMR, 10.10.2017 - 6813/09
FATIH TAS v. TURKEY (No. 2)
As regards the necessity of the interference in a democratic society, the Court notes that it has already examined similar grievances in a number of other cases and found violations of Article 10 of the Convention (see, for example, Sürek c. Turquie (no. 4) [GC], no. 24762/94, §§ 54-61, 8 July 1999; Erdogdu v. Turkey, no. 25723/94, §§ 60-73, ECHR 2000-VI; Demirel and Ates v. Turkey (no. 3), no. 11976/03, §§ 19-30, 9 December 2008). - EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 37091/11
DÜNDAR AND AYDINKAYA v. TURKEY
As regards the necessity of the interference in a democratic society, the Court notes that it has already examined similar grievances in a number of other cases and found violations of Article 10 of the Convention (see, for example, Sürek v. Turkey (no. 4) [GC], no. 24762/94, §§ 54-61, 8 July 1999; Erdogdu v. Turkey, no. 25723/94, §§ 60-73, ECHR 2000-VI; Demirel and Ates v. Turkey (no. 3), no. 11976/03, §§ 19-30, 9 December 2008; and Fatih Tas (No.2), cited above, §§ 12-19).