Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  UNISTAR VENTURES GMBH v. MOLDOVA

  Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of P1-1 Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 20.02.2007 - 19245/03
• EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 19245/03

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 20.04.2004 - 60115/00

  Meinungsfreiheit von Rechtsanwälten bei der öffentlichen Kritik von …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 19245/03

  The Court reiterates that in order for costs and expenses to be included in an award under Article 41 of the Convention, it must be established that they were actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum (see, for example, Amihalachioaie v. Moldova, no. 60115/00, § 47, ECHR 2004-III).
• EGMR, 18.02.1999 - 33158/96

  LAINO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 19245/03

  Since the issues complained of under this Article are similar to those examined under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (see paragraphs 94-97 above), the Court does not consider it necessary to examine separately this complaint (see, mutatis mutandis, Megadat.com S.r.l. v. Moldova, no. 21151/04, § 80, 8 April 2008; Davidescu v. Romania, no. 2252/02, § 57, 16 November 2006; Laino v. Italy [GC], no. 33158/96, § 25, ECHR 1999-I; and Zanghì v. Italy, 19 February 1991, § 23, Series A no. 194-C).
• EGMR, 16.11.2006 - 2252/02

  DAVIDESCU c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 19245/03

  Since the issues complained of under this Article are similar to those examined under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (see paragraphs 94-97 above), the Court does not consider it necessary to examine separately this complaint (see, mutatis mutandis, Megadat.com S.r.l. v. Moldova, no. 21151/04, § 80, 8 April 2008; Davidescu v. Romania, no. 2252/02, § 57, 16 November 2006; Laino v. Italy [GC], no. 33158/96, § 25, ECHR 1999-I; and Zanghì v. Italy, 19 February 1991, § 23, Series A no. 194-C).
• EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13427/87

  RAFFINERIES GRECQUES STRAN ET STRATIS ANDREADIS c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 19245/03

  In order to determine when the applicant company started to have a "possession" for the purposes of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, the Court must ascertain whether the judgment of 6 August 2002 gave rise to a debt in its favour that was sufficiently established to be enforceable (see Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, 9 December 1994, § 59, Series A no. 301-B).
• EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 17849/91

  PRESSOS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 19245/03

  The Court reiterates that Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 protects pecuniary assets, such as debts (see Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium, 20 November 1995, § 31, Series A no. 332).

• EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 28648/06

  TURTURICA AND CASIAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA

  In view of its findings under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (see paragraphs 39-55 above), the Court does not consider it necessary to examine this complaint separately (see Zanghì v. Italy, judgment of 19 February 1991, Series A no. 194-C, § 23; Laino v. Italy [GC], no. 33158/96, § 25, ECHR 1999-I; Davidescu v. Romania, no. 2252/02, § 57, 16 November 2006; and Unistar Ventures GmbH v. Moldova, no. 19245/03, § 99, 9 December 2008).