Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 39543/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,56565) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DANKER v. FINLAND
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 29.05.2007 - 39543/04
- EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 39543/04
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 13.11.2003 - 27156/02
MORBY contre le LUXEMBOURG
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 39543/04
However, this general rule is subject to an exception when the national authorities have acknowledged in a sufficiently clear way the failure to observe the reasonable time requirement and have afforded redress by reducing the sentence in an express and measurable manner (see Eckle v. Germany, cited above, § 66, Beck v. Norway, no. 26390/95, § 27, 26 June 2001, Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, § 77, ECHR 2006-... and Morby v. Luxembourg (dec.), no. 27156/02, ECHR 2003-XI). - EGMR, 15.06.1992 - 12433/86
LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 39543/04
An individual can no longer claim to be a victim of a violation of the Convention when the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, the breach of the Convention and afforded redress (see Eckle v. Germany, judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, § 66; for the application of this principle in the context of Article 6, see Lüdi v. Switzerland, judgment of 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238 at § 34, and Schlader v. Austria (dec.), no. 31093/96, 7 March 2000). - EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78
Eckle ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 39543/04
An individual can no longer claim to be a victim of a violation of the Convention when the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, the breach of the Convention and afforded redress (see Eckle v. Germany, judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, § 66; for the application of this principle in the context of Article 6, see Lüdi v. Switzerland, judgment of 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238 at § 34, and Schlader v. Austria (dec.), no. 31093/96, 7 March 2000).