Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GALUSIEWICZ v. POLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3 MRK
  Partly struck out of the list Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03

  CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 8651/04

  The relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for the excessive length of judicial proceedings are stated in the Court's decisions in Charzynski v. Poland (no. 15212/03 (dec.), §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V) and Ratajczyk v. Poland (no. 11215/02 (dec.), ECHR 2005-VIII), and its judgment in Krasuski v. Poland (no. 61444/00, §§ 34-46, ECHR 2005-V).

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including cases brought against Poland, its practice regarding complaints concerning the violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time and the lack of an effective remedy capable of providing redress for a breach of that right (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-....; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-IX; and Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005-...).

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 8651/04

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including cases brought against Poland, its practice regarding complaints concerning the violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time and the lack of an effective remedy capable of providing redress for a breach of that right (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-....; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-IX; and Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005-...).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 8651/04

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including cases brought against Poland, its practice regarding complaints concerning the violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time and the lack of an effective remedy capable of providing redress for a breach of that right (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-....; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-IX; and Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005-...).

 
• EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 52690/99

  MAJEWSKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 8651/04

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including cases brought against Poland, its practice regarding complaints concerning the violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time and the lack of an effective remedy capable of providing redress for a breach of that right (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-....; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-IX; and Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005-...).
• EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 56026/00

  WENDE AND KUKOWKA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 8651/04

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including cases brought against Poland, its practice regarding complaints concerning the violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time and the lack of an effective remedy capable of providing redress for a breach of that right (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-....; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-IX; and Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005-...).
• EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03

  SULWINSKA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 8651/04

  To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; see also WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007, and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03).