Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.01.2002 - 67128/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,48767) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 10.01.2002 - 67128/01
- EGMR, 24.03.2005 - 67128/01
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96
GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2002 - 67128/01
Moreover, while Article 6 of the Convention guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence or the way it should be assessed, which are therefore primarily matters for regulation by national law and the national courts (Garcia Ruiz c. Espagne [GC], n° 30544/96, § 27, CEDH 1999-I). - EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 2122/64
Wemhoff ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2002 - 67128/01
As regards the applicant's complaint that his pre-trial detention was unreasonably long, the Court observes that Article 5 § 3 covers the period from the arrest of the accused on suspicion of having committed a criminal offence to his acquittal or conviction by the trial court (the Wemhoff v. Germany judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 7, p. 24, § 9). - EGMR, 06.12.1988 - 10588/83
BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2002 - 67128/01
Article 6 § 2 requires, inter alia, that when carrying out their duties, the members of a court should not start with the preconceived idea that the accused has committed the offence charged; the burden of proof is on the prosecution, and any doubt should benefit the accused (see the Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain judgment of 6 December 1988, Series A no. 146, pp. 31 and 33, §§ 67-68 and 77).