Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.01.2006 - 33379/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,65585) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
EZEL TOSUN v. TURKEY
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 No separate issue under P1-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 07.10.2004 - 33379/02
- EGMR, 10.01.2006 - 33379/02
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2006 - 33379/02
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 25.09.2001 - 29279/95
SAHINER v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2006 - 33379/02
It must nevertheless take account of the state of the proceedings at that time (see Sahiner v. Turkey, no. 29279/95, § 21, ECHR 2001 IX).
- EGMR, 10.06.2008 - 287/03
ÇENGELLI AND ERYILMAZ v. TURKEY
The Court reiterates that it has already examined and rejected, in previous cases, similar objections of the Government as regards the alleged incompatibility ratione temporis (see Sahiner v. Turkey, no. 29279/95, § 21, ECHR 2001-IX; Ezel Tosun v. Turkey, no. 33379/02, § 16, 10 January 2006).