Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.01.2006 - 59578/00 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,62507) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ILVESVIITA-SALLINEN v. FINLAND
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 22.06.2004 - 59578/00
- EGMR, 10.01.2006 - 59578/00
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72
HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2006 - 59578/00
In this way, it is an important aspect of the principle that the machinery of protection established by the Convention is subsidiary to the national systems safeguarding human rights (see Handyside v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, p. 22, § 48, and, mutatis mutandis, Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, judgment of 16 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV, p. 1210, § 65). - EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84
CARDOT c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2006 - 59578/00
Article 35 § 1 also requires that the complaints intended to be made subsequently at Strasbourg should have been made to the appropriate domestic body, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law and, further, that any procedural means that might prevent a breach of the Convention should have been used (see Cardot v. France, judgment of 19 March 1991, Series A no. 200, p. 18, § 34). - EGMR, 29.04.1988 - 10328/83
BELILOS v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2006 - 59578/00
It must also satisfy a series of further requirements - independence, in particular of the executive; impartiality; duration of its members" terms of office; guarantees afforded by its procedure - several of which appear in the text of Article 6 § 1 itself (see, among other authorities, Belilos v. Switzerland, judgment of 29 April 1988, Series A no. 132, § 64).