Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SHAHANOV v. BULGARIA

  Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 13+8, Art. 13+6 Abs. 1, Art. 13+3 MRK
  Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 13+3 Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 13+8 Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 13+6-1 (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Shahanov v. Bulgaria

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 16391/05

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case; and the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 16391/05

  It further reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 06.03.2001 - 40907/98

  Griechenland, Ausweisung, Abschiebung, Abschiebungshaft, Haftbedingungen, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 16391/05

  The Court finds that this analysis had the effect of diminishing the relevance of each argument in assessing the overall conditions of detention and thus amounted to a failure to consider the cumulative effects of these conditions on the applicant, as required by the Convention (see Dougoz v. Greece, no. 40907/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-II).

 
• EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 28300/06

  SLAWOMIR MUSIAL v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 16391/05

  Restatements of the general principles concerning the examination of conditions of detention under Article 3 may be found in the Court's recent judgments in the cases of Slawomir Musial v. Poland, no. 28300/06, §§ 85-88, ECHR 2009-... (extracts); Orchowski v. Poland, no. 17885/04, §§ 119-122, ECHR 2009-... (extracts); and Norbert Sikorski v. Poland, no. 17599/05, §§ 126-131, 22 October 2009.
• EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 17599/05

  NORBERT SIKORSKI c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 16391/05

  Restatements of the general principles concerning the examination of conditions of detention under Article 3 may be found in the Court's recent judgments in the cases of Slawomir Musial v. Poland, no. 28300/06, §§ 85-88, ECHR 2009-... (extracts); Orchowski v. Poland, no. 17885/04, §§ 119-122, ECHR 2009-... (extracts); and Norbert Sikorski v. Poland, no. 17599/05, §§ 126-131, 22 October 2009.
• EGMR, 20.07.2010 - 7481/06

  CIORAP v. MOLDOVA (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 16391/05

  A decision or measure of the domestic authorities favourable to the applicant is not in principle sufficient to deprive him or her of his or her status as a victim unless those authorities have acknowledged, and then afforded adequate redress for, the breach of the Convention (see, as a recent authority, Ciorap v. Moldova (no. 2), no. 7481/06, § 18, 20 July 2010).
• EGMR, 10.12.1982 - 7604/76

  FOTI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 16391/05

  The Court finds that in the present case the applicant's situation was "substantially affected" on 21 April 2000, when he was placed in pre-trial detention on suspicion of a number of car thefts (see paragraph 17 above, as well as Foti and Others v. Italy, 10 December 1982, §§ 52 and 53, Series A no. 56; and Crowther v. the United Kingdom, no. 53741/00, §§ 8 and 26, 1 February 2005).