Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KHADIJA ISMAYILOVA v. AZERBAIJAN

  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KHADIJA ISMAYILOVA v. AZERBAIJAN and 1 other application

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (11)Neu Zitiert selbst (21)

• EGMR, 29.01.2015 - 54204/08

  UZEYIR JAFAROV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2019 - 65286/13

  (a) Uzeyir Jafarov, a newspaper journalist, was violently attacked in 2007 by unknown assailants after publishing an article accusing a senior military officer of corruption and illegal activities (see, in this connection, Uzeyir Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, no. 54204/08, 29 January 2015);.

  The Court has had to deal with a number of cases concerning respondent States" obligations to investigate criminal offences against journalists (see, for examples, Adali v. Turkey, no. 38187/97, § 231, 31 March 2005; Gongadze v. Ukraine, no. 34056/02, §§ 8-15 and 179, ECHR 2005-XI; Uzeyir Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, no. 54204/08, § 52, 29 January 2015; Huseynova v. Azerbaijan, no. 10653/10, § 115, 13 April 2017; and Mazepa and Others v. Russia, no. 15086/07, § 73, 17 July 2018).

• EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 34056/02

  GONGADZE c. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2019 - 65286/13

  The Court has had to deal with a number of cases concerning respondent States" obligations to investigate criminal offences against journalists (see, for examples, Adali v. Turkey, no. 38187/97, § 231, 31 March 2005; Gongadze v. Ukraine, no. 34056/02, §§ 8-15 and 179, ECHR 2005-XI; Uzeyir Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, no. 54204/08, § 52, 29 January 2015; Huseynova v. Azerbaijan, no. 10653/10, § 115, 13 April 2017; and Mazepa and Others v. Russia, no. 15086/07, § 73, 17 July 2018).
• EGMR, 16.03.2000 - 23144/93

  OZGUR GUNDEM c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2019 - 65286/13

  In respect of the States" specific obligations under the Convention, referring to Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain ([GC], nos. 28955/06 and 3 others, § 59, ECHR 2011); Özgür Gündem v. Turkey (no. 23144/93, § 43, ECHR 2000-III); Dink v. Turkey (nos. 2668/07 and 4 others, § 137, 14 September 2010); and a number of other judgments of the Court, the third-party interveners argued that there was a positive obligation under Article 10 on member States to take necessary measures to prevent and investigate conduct designed to restrict journalistic activity.

 
• EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 48183/99

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2019 - 65286/13

  The Court has also held that everyone has the right to live privately, away from unwanted attention (see Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, § 95, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts), and Barbulescu, cited above, § 70).
• EGMR, 31.03.2005 - 38187/97

  ADALI v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2019 - 65286/13

  The Court has had to deal with a number of cases concerning respondent States" obligations to investigate criminal offences against journalists (see, for examples, Adali v. Turkey, no. 38187/97, § 231, 31 March 2005; Gongadze v. Ukraine, no. 34056/02, §§ 8-15 and 179, ECHR 2005-XI; Uzeyir Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, no. 54204/08, § 52, 29 January 2015; Huseynova v. Azerbaijan, no. 10653/10, § 115, 13 April 2017; and Mazepa and Others v. Russia, no. 15086/07, § 73, 17 July 2018).
• EGMR, 11.07.2017 - 2091/13

  M.S. v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2019 - 65286/13

  In particular, effective deterrence against grave acts, where fundamental values and essential aspects of private life are at stake, requires the States to ensure that efficient criminal-law provisions are in place (see X and Y v. the Netherlands, cited above, §§ 23-24 and 27; M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 150, ECHR 2003-XII; K.U. v. Finland, cited above, § 43; A, B and C v. Latvia, no. 30808/11, § 148, 31 March 2016; and M.S. v. Ukraine, no. 2091/13, § 62, 11 July 2017).
• EGMR, 13.04.2017 - 10653/10

  HUSEYNOVA v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2019 - 65286/13

  The Court has had to deal with a number of cases concerning respondent States" obligations to investigate criminal offences against journalists (see, for examples, Adali v. Turkey, no. 38187/97, § 231, 31 March 2005; Gongadze v. Ukraine, no. 34056/02, §§ 8-15 and 179, ECHR 2005-XI; Uzeyir Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, no. 54204/08, § 52, 29 January 2015; Huseynova v. Azerbaijan, no. 10653/10, § 115, 13 April 2017; and Mazepa and Others v. Russia, no. 15086/07, § 73, 17 July 2018).
• EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 2872/02

  K.U. v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2019 - 65286/13

  The latter concept covers the physical and moral integrity of the person, as well as his or her sexual life (compare K.U. v. Finland, no. 2872/02, § 41, ECHR 2008; see also Peck v. the United Kingdom, no. 44647/98, § 57, ECHR 2003-I; E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546/02, § 43, 22 January 2008; A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579/05, § 212, ECHR 2010; and Söderman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786/08, § 86, ECHR 2013).
• EGMR - 28473/12 (anhängig)

  KREJZOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2019 - 65286/13

  28859/11 and 28473/12, § 164-65, 15 November 2016).
• EGMR, 13.02.2003 - 42326/98

  Schutz des Rechts auf Achtung des Privatlebens und Familienlebens; Möglichkeit …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2019 - 65286/13

  In particular, in both instances regard must be had to the fair balance which has to be struck between the competing interests (see Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362/04, § 70, ECHR 2007-V; Odièvre v. France [GC], no. 42326/98, § 40, ECHR 2003-III; and Dubská and Krejzová v. the Czech Republic [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98

  M.C. c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 17.07.2018 - 15086/07

  Mord an Journalistin: Russland wegen Politkowskaja-Ermittlungen verurteilt
• EGMR, 24.05.2011 - 33810/07

  ASSOCIATION
• EGMR, 22.01.2008 - 43546/02

  E.B. v. FRANCE
• EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 2668/07

  DINK c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 22457/08

  M.P. AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 12.09.2011 - 28955/06

  PALOMO SÁNCHEZ ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE
• EGMR, 31.03.2016 - 30808/11

  A, B AND C v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 20.03.2012 - 26692/05

  C.A.S. AND C.S. v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08

  Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …
• EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 76639/11

  DENISOV v. UKRAINE

• EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 14065/15

  LACATUS c. SUISSE

  Souvent mentionnée sur le terrain de l'article 3, cette notion a également été évoquée à plusieurs reprises par la Cour sous l'angle de l'article 8 (voir notamment, Kucera c. Slovaquie, no 48666/99, § 122, 17 juillet 2007 ; Rachwalski et Ferenc c. Pologne, no 47709/99, § 73, 28 juillet 2009 ; El-Masri c. l'ex-République yougoslave de Macédoine [GC], no 39630/09, § 248, CEDH 2012 ; Khadija Ismayilova c. Azerbaïdjan, nos 65286/13 et 57270/14, § 116, 10 janvier 2019 ; Beizaras et Levickas c. Lituanie, no 41288/15, § 117, 14 janvier 2020 ; Vinks et Ribicka c. Lettonie, no 28926/10, § 114, 30 janvier 2020, et Hudorovic et autres c. Slovénie, nos 24816/14 et 25140/14, § 116, 10 mars 2020).
• EGMR, 09.03.2023 - 36345/16

  L.B. v. HUNGARY

  β) Le principe de la minimisation des données (article 5 c) de la Convention sur la protection des données), selon lequel les données à caractère personnel doivent être adéquates, pertinentes et limitées à ce qui est nécessaire au regard des finalités pour lesquelles elles sont traitées (S. et Marper, précité, § 103), et toute divulgation excessive et superflue de renseignements privés sensibles sans lien avec le but poursuivi consistant à informer le public est injustifiée (Khadija Ismayilova c. Azerbaïdjan, nos 65286/13 et 57270/14, §§ 147-149, 10 janvier 2019).
• EGMR, 06.09.2022 - 24738/19

  GASI AND OTHERS v. SERBIA

  In particular, the positive obligations under Article 10 of the Convention require States to create, while establishing an effective system for the protection of journalists, a favourable environment for participation in public debate by all the persons concerned, enabling them to express their opinions and ideas without fear, even if they run counter to those defended by the official authorities or by a significant part of public opinion, or even if irritating or shocking to the latter (see Dink, § 137, and Huseynova, § 120, both cited above; see also Khadija Ismayilova v. Azerbaijan, nos. 65286/13 and 57270/14, § 158, 10 January 2019).

  This should enable the expression of opinions and ideas without fear, even if they may run counter to those defended by the official authorities or by a significant part of public opinion (see Khadija Ismayilova v. Azerbaijan, nos. 65286/13 and 57270/14, § 158, 10 January 2019).

 
• EGMR, 14.01.2021 - 281/15

  SOCIÉTÉ ÉDITRICE DE MEDIAPART ET AUTRES c. FRANCE

  La Cour a, par ailleurs, déjà eu l'occasion de souligner, sous l'angle de l'article 8 de la Convention, que les atteintes à la vie privée résultant d'une intrusion dans l'intimité des individus commises par des dispositifs techniques d'écoutes, de vidéo ou de photographies clandestines doivent faire l'objet d'une protection particulièrement attentive (Von Hannover, précité, Couderc et Hachette Filipacci Associés, précité, Haldimann et autres c. Suisse, no 21830/09, CEDH 2015, Alpha Doryforiki Tileorasi Anonymi Etairia c. Grèce, no 72562/10, 22 février 2018 et Khadija Ismayilova c. Azerbaïdjan, nos 65286/13 et 57270/14, 10 janvier 2019).
• EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 72611/14

  TAGIYEVA v. AZERBAIJAN

  In particular, the positive obligations under Article 10 of the Convention require States to create, while establishing an effective system of protection of authors or journalists, a favourable environment for participation in public debate by all the persons concerned, enabling them to express their opinions and ideas without fear, even if they run counter to those defended by the official authorities or by a significant part of public opinion, or are even irritating or shocking to them (see Dink, cited above, § 137, and Khadija Ismayilova v. Azerbaijan, nos. 65286/13 and 57270/14, § 158, 10 January 2019).
• EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 42541/18

  TENA ARREGUI v. SPAIN

  In particular, effective deterrence against grave acts, where fundamental values and essential aspects of private life are at stake, requires the States to ensure that efficient criminal-law provisions are in place (see Khadija Ismayilova v. Azerbaijan, nos. 65286/13 and 57270/14, § 115, 10 January 2019, with further references).
• EGMR, 28.06.2022 - 36584/17

  M.D. AND OTHERS v. SPAIN

  Concerning serious acts, the State's positive obligation under Article 8 to safeguard individuals' physical or moral integrity may also extend to questions relating to the effectiveness of a criminal investigation (see Khadija Ismayilova v. Azerbaijan, nos. 65286/13 and 57270/14, § 115, 10 January 2019).
• EGMR, 15.03.2022 - 14191/14

  STRAISTA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  Further general principles concerning the obligation to carry out an efficient investigation have been summarised in Khadija Ismayilova v. Azerbaijan (nos. 65286/13 and 57270/14, § 115 et seq., 10 January 2019).
• EGMR - 226/18 (anhängig)

  YEVSTIFEYEV v. RUSSIA and 16 other applications

  65286/13 and 57270/14, §§ 158-66, 10 January 2019), taken alone or in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention?.
• EGMR - 4106/24 (anhängig)

  SADAGHASHVILI AND GELITASHVILI v. GEORGIA

  In so far as the investigation into the assault on the applicants is concerned, did the Government discharge their positive obligation under Article 10 of the Convention to take all necessary measures to investigate conduct designed to restrict journalistic activity, including private violent acts committed against journalists (see, among other authorities, Khadija Ismayilova v. Azerbaijan, nos. 65286/13 and 57270/14, §§ 158-66, 10 January 2019; see also Özgür Gündem v. Turkey, no. 23144/93, §§ 42-46, ECHR 2000-III, and Najafli v. Azerbaijan, no. 2594/07, §§ 57-70, 2 October 2012)?.
• EGMR, 30.08.2022 - 8647/12

  Y.G. v. RUSSIA