Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HALIL ADEM HASAN v. BULGARIA

  Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 12.07.2013 - 25424/09

  ALLEN c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.03.2015 - 4374/05

  Its general aim, in this second aspect, is to protect individuals who have been acquitted of a criminal charge, or in respect of whom criminal proceedings have been discontinued, from being treated by public officials and authorities as though they are in fact guilty of the offence charged (see Allen v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 25424/09, § 94, ECHR 2013).
• EGMR, 20.06.2006 - 17209/02

  ZARB ADAMI c. MALTE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.03.2015 - 4374/05

  The Court recalls that Article 14 does not prohibit distinctions in treatment which are founded on an objective assessment of essentially different factual circumstances (see Zarb Adami v. Malta, no. 17209/02, § 73, ECHR 2006-VIII).

• EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 17808/19

  PAKETOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Finally, as regards the possibility for the applicants to have brought anti-discrimination proceedings, in view of the characteristics of the remedy under the PADA, the Court has previously held that such a mechanism could, in principle, represent an effective remedy in cases where individuals complain of having suffered discriminatory treatment (see, among others, Halil Adem Hasan v. Bulgaria, no. 4374/05, § 71, 10 March 2015).