Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.04.2008 - 3548/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,61235) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LUCHKINA v. RUSSIA
(englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (6)
- EGMR, 19.05.2020 - 55610/18
RS INVESTMENT LTD v. SLOVAKIA
They may be disturbed only to correct fundamental defects, such as jurisdictional error, a serious breach of court procedure or abuses of power, which may justify the quashing (see Luchkina v. Russia, no. 3548/04, § 21, 10 April 2008). - EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 21834/05
SHANOVY v. RUSSIA
The Court has previously listed among such possible defects jurisdictional errors, serious breaches of court procedure or abuse of power (see Luchkina v. Russia, no. 3548/04, § 21, 10 April 2008). - EGMR, 20.01.2022 - 57211/13
VYELYEV v. UKRAINE
The Court reiterates its consistent approach in that regard, noting that, in the absence of a fundamental defect in the previous proceedings, a disagreement with the assessment made by the lower courts is not a circumstance of a substantial and compelling character warranting the quashing of a binding and enforceable judgment and reopening of the proceedings concerning the applicant's claim (see Dovguchits v. Russia, no. 2999/03, § 30, 7 June 2007; Kot v. Russia, no. 20887/03, § 29, 18 January 2007; and Luchkina v. Russia, no. 3548/04, § 21, 10 April 2008).
- EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 35361/17
TÓTH v. SLOVAKIA
They may be disturbed only to correct fundamental defects, such as jurisdictional error, a serious breach of court procedure or abuses of power, which may justify the quashing (see Luchkina v. Russia, no. 3548/04, § 21, 10 April 2008). - EGMR, 19.05.2020 - 2749/17
REDQUEST LIMITED v. SLOVAKIA
They may be disturbed only to correct fundamental defects, such as jurisdictional error, a serious breach of court procedure or abuses of power, which may justify the quashing (see Luchkina v. Russia, no. 3548/04, § 21, 10 April 2008). - EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 74175/17
PÁDEJ v. SLOVAKIA
They may be disturbed only to correct fundamental defects, such as jurisdictional error, a serious breach of court procedure or abuses of power, which may justify the quashing (see Luchkina v. Russia, no. 3548/04, § 21, 10 April 2008).