Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 14401/17 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,10871) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
Q v. SLOVENIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 14401/17
As regards the complaint under Article 13 of the Convention, the Court reiterates that the Article in question requires a remedy in domestic law only where an individual has an "arguable claim" that one of his or her rights or freedoms set forth in the Convention has been violated (see, for example, Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131). - EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98
SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 14401/17
That is so because respect for family life in such situations implies an obligation for the State to act in a manner calculated to allow the ties between grandparents and their grandchildren to develop normally (see Kruskic, cited above, § 110, and Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 221, ECHR 2000-VIII).
- EGMR, 08.02.2022 - 19938/20
Q AND R v. SLOVENIA
The issue as to whether the children should have been returned to the applicants following the aforementioned Supreme Court's decision was the subject of the Court's inadmissibility decision in Q v. Slovenia (dec.) [Committee], no. 14401/17, 10 April 2018.