Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BALANINA v. RUSSIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 28448/16

  CHIGIRINOVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 41441/16

  Relevant domestic law provisions have been summarised by the Court in the case of Chigirinova v. Russia (dec.), no. 28448/16, §§ 8-26, 13 December 2016.

  The Court recalls that it has recently recognised that an application for cassation review before the Supreme Court of Russia constitutes an effective remedy capable of providing redress in cases examined under the Code of Administrative Procedure (see Chigirinova v. Russia (dec.), no. 28448/16, § 29, 13 December 2016).

• EGMR, 02.10.2008 - 64398/01

  SAMOYLOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 41441/16

  In such a case a mere doubt as to the prospect of success would not be sufficient to exempt an applicant from submitting a complaint to the competent authority (see Samoylov v. Russia, no. 64398/01, § 25, 2 October 2008, with further references).
• EGMR, 12.05.2015 - 38951/13

  ABRAMYAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 41441/16

  38951/13 and 59611/13, §§ 76-96, 12 May 2015).

 
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 41441/16

  In order to comply with the rule, applicants should normally use remedies which are available and sufficient to afford redress in respect of the breaches alleged (see, among other authorities, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V).
• EGMR, 12.01.2006 - 18888/02

  IÇYER c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 41441/16

  However, as the Court has held on many occasions, this rule is subject to exceptions, which may be justified by the particular circumstances of each case (see with further references Içyer v. Turkey (dec.), no. 18888/02, § 72, ECHR 2006-I).
• EGMR, 29.03.2016 - 16899/13

  KOCHEROV AND SERGEYEVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 41441/16

  For instance, such exception may be applied where sufficient information existed at the time of lodging of a complaint to the Court that would enable an applicant to anticipate the new exhaustion requirement (see, mutatis mutandis, Kocherov and Sergeyeva v. Russia, no. 16899/13, § 68, 29 March 2016).
• EGMR, 18.10.2016 - 16559/16

  SAKHANOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 41441/16

  The Court expressly recognised similarity of the newly introduced review proceedings for commercial court to the cassation and supervisory review proceedings under the Code of Civil Procedure and applied mutatis mutandis its conclusions made in Abramyan and Others (see Sakhanov v. Russia (dec.), no. 16559/16, §§ 32-36, 28 October 2016).