Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 77546/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,7895) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ELITA MAGOMADOVA v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
MAGOMADOVA v. RUSSIA
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 29.04.2014 - 60092/12
Z.J. v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 77546/14
It follows from these considerations that the Court's task is not to substitute itself for the domestic authorities in the exercise of their responsibilities regarding child custody and access issues, but rather to review, in the light of the Convention, the decisions taken by those authorities in the exercise of their power of appreciation (see Sahin v. Germany [GC], no. 30943/96, § 64, ECHR 2003-VIII; Sommerfeld v. Germany [GC], no. 31871/96, § 62, ECHR 2003-VIII (extracts); C. v. Finland, no. 18249/02, § 52, 9 May 2006; and Z.J. v. Lithuania, no. 60092/12, § 96, 29 April 2014).
- EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 70489/17
ALGIRDAS BUTKEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
The scope of the Court's task is subject to limits inherent in the subsidiary nature of the Convention, and it cannot question the way in which the domestic authorities have interpreted and applied national law, except in cases of flagrant non-observance or arbitrariness, which the Court cannot discern in the present case (see, mutatis mutandis, Elita Magomadova v. Russia, no. 77546/14, § 59, 10 April 2018, and the case-law cited therein).