Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2001,26241
EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95 (https://dejure.org/2001,26241)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 10.05.2001 - 29392/95 (https://dejure.org/2001,26241)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 10. Mai 2001 - 29392/95 (https://dejure.org/2001,26241)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2001,26241) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    Z ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 36, Art. 36 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation de l'art. 3 Aucune question distincte au regard de l'art. 8 Non-violation de l'art. 6 Violation de l'art. 13 Dommage matériel - réparation pécuniaire Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire (französisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    Z AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 36, Art. 36 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation of Art. 3 No separate issue under Art. 8 No violation of Art. 6 Violation of Art. 13 Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ...

  • juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (123)Neu Zitiert selbst (18)

  • EGMR, 21.09.1994 - 17101/90

    FAYED c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95
    That decision concerned only one aspect of the exercise of local authorities' powers and duties and cannot be regarded as an arbitrary removal of the courts' jurisdiction to determine a whole range of civil claims (see Fayed v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B, pp. 49-50, § 65).

    Paragraph 98 of the judgment refers to Fayed v. the United Kingdom (judgment of 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B).

    In Fayed v. the United Kingdom (judgment of 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B, pp. 49-50, § 65), the Court said:.

  • EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 28945/95

    T.P. ET K.M. c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95
    The composition of the Grand Chamber was determined according to the provisions of Article 27 §§ 2 and 3 of the Convention and Rule 24. The President of the Court decided that in the interests of the proper administration of justice, the case should be assigned to the Grand Chamber that had been constituted to hear the case of T.P. and K.M. v. the United Kingdom ([GC], no. 28945/95, ECHR 2001-V) (Rules 24, 43 § 2, and 71).

    They also queried the involvement of the AIRE Centre in addition to an experienced counsel and solicitor, and noted that the AIRE Centre's fees for attending the hearing had also been billed in full in the second case, T.P. and K.M. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28945/95, ECHR 2001-V, heard before the Court on the same day.

  • EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23657/94

    ÇAKICI v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95
    57-58, §§ 16-20, and Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 127, ECHR 1999-IV).
     
  • EGMR, 23.11.1999 - 33747/96

    BROMILEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95
    This Court has found no denial of access to a court where judges have struck out cases where there has been no proximity or foreseeability (see, for example, Powell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 45305/99, ECHR 2000-V, and Bromiley v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 33747/96, 23 November 1999, unreported).
  • EGMR, 04.05.2000 - 45305/99

    POWELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95
    This Court has found no denial of access to a court where judges have struck out cases where there has been no proximity or foreseeability (see, for example, Powell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 45305/99, ECHR 2000-V, and Bromiley v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 33747/96, 23 November 1999, unreported).
  • EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 6538/74

    SUNDAY TIMES c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1) (ARTICLE 50)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95
    The question to be decided in such cases is the level of just satisfaction, in respect of both past and future pecuniary losses, which it is necessary to award each applicant, the matter to be determined by the Court at its discretion, having regard to what is equitable (see The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1) (Article 50), judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 38, p. 9, § 15, and Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom (just satisfaction), nos.
  • EGMR, 13.06.1994 - 10588/83

    BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN (ARTICLE 50)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95
    As regards the applicants' claims for pecuniary loss, the Court's case-law establishes that there must be a clear causal connection between the damage claimed by the applicant and the violation of the Convention and that this may, in the appropriate case, include compensation in respect of loss of earnings (see, among other authorities, Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain (Article 50), judgment of 13 June 1994, Series A no. 285-C, pp.
  • EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

    Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95
    As far as Convention wrongs are concerned, that principle is embodied in Article 13 (see, inter alia, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-XI).
  • EGMR, 23.10.1985 - 8848/80

    BENTHEM v. THE NETHERLANDS

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95
    It will however apply to disputes of a "genuine and serious nature" concerning the actual existence of the right as well as to the scope or manner in which it is exercised (see Benthem v. the Netherlands, judgment of 23 October 1985, Series A no. 97, pp. 14-15, § 32).
  • EGMR, 06.09.1978 - 5029/71

    Klass u.a. ./. Deutschland

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95
    The Court does not consider it appropriate in this case to make any findings as to whether only court proceedings could have furnished effective redress, though judicial remedies indeed furnish strong guarantees of independence, access for the victim and family, and enforceability of awards in compliance with the requirements of Article 13 (see, mutatis mutandis, Klass and Others v. Germany, judgment of 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28, p. 30, § 67).
  • EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78

    ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80

    LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

    GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  • EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 10873/84

    TRE TRAKTÖRER AKTIEBOLAG v. SWEDEN

  • EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75

    SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE

  • EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 18139/91

    TOLSTOY MILOSLAVSKY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81

    POWELL ET RAYNER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  • EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75

    LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE

  • EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

    Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …

    A positive obligation on the State to provide protection against inhuman or degrading treatment has been found to arise in a number of cases: see, for example, the above-cited A. v. the United Kingdom where the child applicant had been caned by his stepfather, and Z. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC] (no. 29392/95 ECHR 2001-V), where four child applicants were severely abused and neglected by their parents.
  • EGMR, 19.07.2012 - 497/09

    Mangelnde Prüfung der Klage / des Rechtsmittels des Ehemanns einer sterbewilligen …

    It is fundamental to the machinery of protection established by the Convention that the national systems themselves provide redress for breaches of its provisions, with the Court exercising a supervisory role subject to the principle of subsidiarity (compare, among other authorities, Z. and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 29392/95, § 103, ECHR 2001-V and A. and Others v. the United Kingdom (GC), no. 3455/05, § 147, ECHR 2009).
  • EGMR, 30.11.2004 - 48939/99

    ÖNERYILDIZ c. TURQUIE

    Article 13 of the Convention requires domestic legal systems to make available an effective remedy empowering the competent national authority to address the substance of an "arguable" complaint under the Convention (see Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 108, ECHR 2001-V).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht