Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 78145/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,54691) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KOVALEV v. RUSSIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 34, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 23.03.2006 - 78145/01
- EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 78145/01
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 25.07.2000 - 24954/94
TIERCE ET AUTRES c. SAINT-MARIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 78145/01
As regards the public nature of the hearing, the Court reiterates that this guarantee was intended to protect litigants from the risk of justice being administered in secret without public scrutiny; it was also a means of fostering public confidence in the courts, since it made the administration of justice more transparent and contributed to a fair trial, a feature of any democratic society (see, among other authorities, Tierce and Others v. San Marino, nos. 24954/94, 24971/94 and 24972/94, § 92, ECHR 2000-IX, and Axen v. Germany, judgment of 8 December 1983, Series A no. 72, p. 12, § 25). - EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 44759/98
Verletzung des Rechts auf ein faires Verfahren durch überlange Verfahrensdauer; …
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 78145/01
According to its case-law, the concept of "civil rights and obligations" cannot be interpreted solely by reference to the domestic law of the respondent State, but must be considered "autonomous" within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, König v. Germany, judgment of 28 June 1978, Series A no. 27, pp. 29-30, §§ 88-89; Baraona v. Portugal, judgment of 8 July 1987, Series A no. 122, pp. 17-18, § 42; and Ferrazzini v. Italy [GC], no. 44759/98, § 24, ECHR 2001-VII). - EGMR, 08.12.1983 - 8273/78
Axen ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 78145/01
As regards the public nature of the hearing, the Court reiterates that this guarantee was intended to protect litigants from the risk of justice being administered in secret without public scrutiny; it was also a means of fostering public confidence in the courts, since it made the administration of justice more transparent and contributed to a fair trial, a feature of any democratic society (see, among other authorities, Tierce and Others v. San Marino, nos. 24954/94, 24971/94 and 24972/94, § 92, ECHR 2000-IX, and Axen v. Germany, judgment of 8 December 1983, Series A no. 72, p. 12, § 25). - EGMR, 28.06.1978 - 6232/73
König ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 78145/01
According to its case-law, the concept of "civil rights and obligations" cannot be interpreted solely by reference to the domestic law of the respondent State, but must be considered "autonomous" within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, König v. Germany, judgment of 28 June 1978, Series A no. 27, pp. 29-30, §§ 88-89; Baraona v. Portugal, judgment of 8 July 1987, Series A no. 122, pp. 17-18, § 42; and Ferrazzini v. Italy [GC], no. 44759/98, § 24, ECHR 2001-VII). - EGMR, 24.02.1995 - 16424/90
McMICHAEL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 78145/01
The Court reiterates, next, that the right to a fair hearing, in particular the principle of adversarial proceedings and equality of arms, requires that each party be given a reasonable opportunity to have knowledge of and comment on the observations filed or evidence adduced by the other party and to present his case under conditions that do not place him at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his opponent (see X v. Austria, no. 5362/72, Commission decision of 14 December 1972, Collection 42, p. 145, and McMichael v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 24 February 1995, Series A no. 307-B, §§ 17 and 27).