Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 28328/03   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2012,16523
EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 28328/03 (https://dejure.org/2012,16523)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 10.05.2012 - 28328/03 (https://dejure.org/2012,16523)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 10. Mai 2012 - 28328/03 (https://dejure.org/2012,16523)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,16523) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    AIGNER v. AUSTRIA

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
    No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses) (englisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    AIGNER v. AUSTRIA- [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

    [DEU] No violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (7)

  • EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 9154/10

    Recht auf Konfrontation und Befragung von Zeugen (Al-Khawaja-Test; Recht auf ein

    The Court has found in that context that where the investigating authorities had already taken the view at the investigation stage that a witness would not be heard at the trial, it was essential to give the defence an opportunity to have questions put to the victim during the preliminary investigation (see Rosin, cited above, §§ 57 et seq., in particular §§ 57 and 60, and Vronchenko, cited above, §§ 61 and 63, both concerning the absence at the trial of a minor victim of a sexual offence for the protection of the child's well-being; and compare Aigner v. Austria, no. 28328/03, §§ 41-42, 10 May 2012, and Trampevski, cited above, § 45).

    29900/96, 29901/96, 29902/96 and 29903/96, § 65, ECHR 2001"VIII; Sommer v. Italy (dec.), no. 36586/08, 23 March 2010; Chmura v. Poland, no. 18475/05, §§ 49-59, 3 April 2012; and Aigner v. Austria, no. 28328/03, § 41, 10 May 2012).

  • EGMR, 31.08.2021 - 6386/17

    B.?". v. POLAND

    In the assessment of the question whether or not in such proceedings an accused received a fair trial, account must be taken of the right to respect for the private life of the perceived victim (see S.N. v. Sweden, no. 34209/96, § 47, ECHR 2002-V; Bocos-Cuesta v. the Netherlands, no. 54789/00, § 69, 10 November 2005; and Aigner v. Austria, no. 28328/03, § 37, 10 May 2012).
  • EGMR, 18.07.2013 - 59632/09

    VRONCHENKO v. ESTONIA

    For this reason, the Court considers it appropriate to examine the complaints under the two provisions taken together (see Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, § 118, ECHR 2011, and Aigner v. Austria, no. 28328/03, § 33, 10 May 2012).
  • EGMR, 27.02.2014 - 5699/11

    LUCIC v. CROATIA

    For this reason, the Court considers it appropriate to examine the complaints under the two provisions taken together (see Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, § 118, ECHR 2011, and Aigner v. Austria, no. 28328/03, § 33, 10 May 2012).
  • EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 14000/12

    T.K. v. LITHUANIA

    Atsizvelgiant į tai, kas pasakyta, Teismas pripazįsta, kad baudziamosiose bylose, susijusiose su seksualiniu prievartavimu, gali b?«ti imamasi tam tikr?³ priemoni?³ nukentejusiajam apsaugoti, jei tokios priemones yra suderinamos su galimybe tinkamai ir veiksmingai pasinaudoti teise į gynyba (zr. Aigner prie?. Austrija, Nr. 28328/03, § 37, 2012 m. geguzes 10 d., ir jame paminetas nuorodas).
  • EGMR, 10.02.2015 - 26504/06

    COLAC v. ROMANIA

    For this reason, the Court considers it appropriate to examine the complaint under the two provisions taken together (see Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, § 118, ECHR 2011, and Aigner v. Austria, no. 28328/03, § 33, 10 May 2012).
  • EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 61047/13

    GONZÁLEZ NÁJERA v. SPAIN

    For this reason, the Court considers it appropriate to examine the complaints under the two provisions taken together (see, amongst the most recent authorities, Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, § 118, ECHR 2011; Aigner v. Austria, no. 28328/03, § 33, 10 May 2012; and Vronchenko v. Estonia, no. 59632/09, § 53, 18 July 2013).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht