Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 60606/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,16098) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TROJAK v. POLAND
Art. 3, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
Struck out of the list (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 60606/09
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI); WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.) no. 28953/03). - EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 17599/05
NORBERT SIKORSKI c. POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 60606/09
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of Article 3 on account of overcrowding and inadequate detention conditions (see, for example, the pilot judgments in the cases of Orchowski v. Poland, no. 17885/04, ECHR 2009-... (extracts) and Norbert Sikorski v. Poland, no. 17599/05, 22 October 2009 and the leading follow-up decision in the case of Latak v. Poland (dec.), no. 52070/08, 12 October 2010). - EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 52070/08
LATAK v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 60606/09
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of Article 3 on account of overcrowding and inadequate detention conditions (see, for example, the pilot judgments in the cases of Orchowski v. Poland, no. 17885/04, ECHR 2009-... (extracts) and Norbert Sikorski v. Poland, no. 17599/05, 22 October 2009 and the leading follow-up decision in the case of Latak v. Poland (dec.), no. 52070/08, 12 October 2010).