Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.06.1996 - 17602/91 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1996,17149) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
THOMANN c. SUISSE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
Non-violation de l'Art. 6-1 (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
THOMANN v. SWITZERLAND
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
No violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch) - Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte
(englisch)
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 05.09.1994 - 17602/91
- EGMR, 10.06.1996 - 17602/91
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 16.07.1971 - 2614/65
RINGEISEN v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.06.1996 - 17602/91
The Court observed that "no ground for legitimate suspicion can be discerned in the fact that" judges who "had taken part in the first decision" also participate in the second (see the judgments of respectively 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, p. 40, para. 97, and 26 September 1995, Series A no. 325-A, p. 17, para. 38). - EGMR, 26.02.1993 - 13396/87
PADOVANI v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.06.1996 - 17602/91
Relying, inter alia, on the judgments of De Cubber v. Belgium of 26 October 1984 (Series A no. 86) and Padovani v. Italy of 26 February 1993 (Series A no. 257-B), he contended that the criminal court that had tried him on 3 October 1990 could not be regarded as impartial because it had been composed of judges who had already convicted him in absentia on 17 May 1989. - EGMR, 26.10.1984 - 9186/80
DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.06.1996 - 17602/91
Relying, inter alia, on the judgments of De Cubber v. Belgium of 26 October 1984 (Series A no. 86) and Padovani v. Italy of 26 February 1993 (Series A no. 257-B), he contended that the criminal court that had tried him on 3 October 1990 could not be regarded as impartial because it had been composed of judges who had already convicted him in absentia on 17 May 1989. - EGMR, 26.09.1995 - 18160/91
DIENNET v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.06.1996 - 17602/91
The Court observed that "no ground for legitimate suspicion can be discerned in the fact that" judges who "had taken part in the first decision" also participate in the second (see the judgments of respectively 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, p. 40, para. 97, and 26 September 1995, Series A no. 325-A, p. 17, para. 38).