Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PRICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 3 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PRICE c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Art. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation de l'art. 3 Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention (französisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 12.09.2000 - 33394/96
• EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 33394/96
• EGMR, 02.12.2011 - 33394/96

Wird zitiert von ... (58)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 34369/97

  THLIMMENOS c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 33394/96

  In this the applicant is different from other people to the extent that treating her like others is not only discrimination but brings about a violation of Article 3. As for the prohibition of discrimination, see Thlimmenos v. Greece ([GC], no. 34369/97, § 44, ECHR 2000-IV), which reads:.
• EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95

  PEERS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 33394/96

  In considering whether treatment is "degrading" within the meaning of Article 3, one of the factors which the Court will take into account is the question whether its object was to humiliate and debase the person concerned, although the absence of any such purpose cannot conclusively rule out a finding of violation of Article 3 (see Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 67-68 and 74, ECHR 2001-III).

• BVerfG, 24.07.2018 - 2 BvR 309/15

  Fixierung in psychiatrischer Unterbringung: Richtervorbehalt erforderlich?

  Erniedrigend ist eine Behandlung, die dem Betroffenen in einer demütigenden oder entwürdigenden Weise das Gefühl von Angst, Schmerz oder Minderwertigkeit vermittelt, das über das mit rechtmäßiger Bestrafung unvermeidliche Maß hinausgeht, wobei eine Demütigungsabsicht mit zu berücksichtigen ist (vgl. EGMR , Labita v. Italy, Urteil vom 6. April 2000, Nr. 26772/95, § 120; EGMR , Kudla v. Poland, Urteil vom 26. Oktober 2000, Nr. 30210/96, § 92; EGMR, Keenan v. The United Kingdom, Urteil vom 3. April 2001, Nr. 27229/95, § 110; EGMR, Price v. The United Kingdom, Urteil vom 10. Juli 2001, Nr. 33394/96, § 24; EGMR, Mouisel v. France, Urteil vom 14. November 2002, Nr. 67263/01, § 37).
• EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

  Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …

  Where treatment humiliates or debases an individual showing a lack of respect for, or diminishing, his or her human dignity or arouses feelings of fear, anguish or inferiority capable of breaking an individual's moral and physical resistance, it may be characterised as degrading and also fall within the prohibition of Article 3 (see amongst recent authorities, Price v. the United Kingdom, no. 33394/96, (Sect. 3), ECHR 2001-VIII, §§ 24-30, and Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, (Sect. 3), ECHR 2001-VIII, § 117).
• EGMR, 27.05.2008 - 26565/05

  N. ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  The suffering which flows from naturally occurring illness, physical or mental, may be covered by Article 3, where it is, or risks being, exacerbated by treatment, whether flowing from conditions of detention, expulsion or other measures, for which the authorities can be held responsible (Pretty v. the United Kingdom, 2346/02, § 52, ECHR 2002-III; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-XI; Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, § 116, ECHR 2001- III; Price v. the United Kingdom, no. 33394/96, § 30, ECHR 2001-VII).

  Where treatment humiliates or debases an individual, showing a lack of respect for, or diminishing, his or her human dignity, or arouses feelings of fear, anguish or inferiority capable of breaking an individual's moral and physical resistance, it may be characterised as degrading and also fall within the prohibition of Article 3 (see amongst recent authorities, Price v. the United Kingdom, no. 33394/96, §§ 24-30, ECHR 2001-VII, and Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 117, ECHR 2001-VIII).

 
• EGMR, 01.09.2015 - 16483/12

  EGMR zum Umgang mit Flüchtlingen in Lampedusa - Die Würde des Menschen ist …

  L'appréciation de ce minimum est relative ; elle dépend de l'ensemble des données de la cause, notamment de la durée du traitement et de ses effets physiques ou mentaux ainsi que, parfois, du sexe, de l'âge et de l'état de santé de la victime (voir, entre autres, Price c. Royaume-Uni, no 33394/96, § 24, CEDH 2001-VII ; Mouisel c. France, no 67263/01, § 37, CEDH 2002-IX ; et Naoumenko c. Ukraine, no 42023/98, § 108, 10 février 2004).
• EGMR, 07.07.2011 - 20999/05

  Unmenschliche und erniedrigende Behandlung durch eine Nacktunterbringung in einer …

  Die Beurteilung dieses Mindestmaßes ist relativ; sie hängt von den gesamten Umständen des Falls wie der Dauer der Behandlung, ihren körperlichen oder seelischen Folgen und zuweilen dem Geschlecht, Alter und Gesundheitszustand des Opfers ab (siehe u.a., Price ./. Vereinigtes Königreich, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 33394/96, Rdnr. 24, ECHR 2001-VII und J., a.a.O., Rdnr. 67).
• EGMR, 30.10.2012 - 57375/08

  Abtreibungsverbot in Polen: Lebensschützer und der "Fall Agata"

  According to the Court's well-established case-law, ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. The assessment of this minimum level of severity is relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see, among many other authorities, Price v. the United Kingdom, no. 33394/96, § 24, ECHR 2001-VII; Kupczak v. Poland, no. 2627/09, § 58, 25 January 2011; Wiktorko v. Poland, no. 14612/02, §§ 44 and 54, 31 March 2009 and R.R. v. Poland, cited above, § 148).
• EGMR, 18.06.2009 - 45603/05

  BUDINA v. RUSSIA

  Where treatment humiliates or debases an individual, showing a lack of respect for, or diminishing, his or her human dignity, or arouses feelings of fear, anguish or inferiority capable of breaking an individual's moral and physical resistance, it may be characterised as degrading and also fall within the prohibition of Article 3 (see amongst other authorities, Price v. the United Kingdom, no. 33394/96, §§ 24-30, ECHR 2001-VII, and Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 117, ECHR 2001-VIII).
• EGMR, 12.03.2013 - 15351/03

  ZARZYCKI v. POLAND

  The assessment of this minimum level of severity is relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see, among other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 91, ECHR 2000-XI; Price v. the United Kingdom, no. 33394/96, § 24, ECHR 2001-VII; and Enea v. Italy [GC], no. 74912/01, § 55, ECHR 2009).

  In view of these considerations, the Court is satisfied that by allowing the applicant to use a shower room six times per week, the authorities adequately responded to his special needs (contrary to, Price v. the United Kingdom, no. 33394/96, §§ 28-30, ECHR 2001-VII and Melnitis v. Latvia, no. 30779/05, § 75, 28 February 2012).

• EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 41526/10

  DORDEVIC c. CROATIE

  La Cour considère que le harcèlement du premier requérant - à cause duquel il a subi au moins une fois des blessures physiques et qui, de surcroît, a fait naître en lui un sentiment de crainte et d'impuissance - est suffisamment sérieux pour atteindre le degré de gravité nécessaire pour relever de l'article 3 de la Convention et que, dès lors, cette disposition est applicable en l'espèce (Price c. Royaume-Uni, no 33394/96, § 24, CEDH 2001-VII, et Milanovic c. Serbie, no 44614/07, § 87, 14 décembre 2010).
• EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 74912/01

  ENEA c. ITALIE

  L'appréciation de ce minimum est relative ; elle dépend de l'ensemble des données de la cause, notamment de la durée du traitement et de ses effets physiques ou mentaux ainsi que, parfois, du sexe, de l'âge et de l'état de santé de la victime (voir, entre autres, Price c. Royaume-Uni, no 33394/96, § 24, CEDH 2001-VII, Mouisel c. France, no 67263/01, § 37, CEDH 2002-IX, et Gennadi Naoumenko c. Ukraine, no 42023/98, § 108, 10 février 2004).
• EGMR, 01.07.2010 - 17674/02

  DAVYDOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 11.06.2009 - 53541/07

  S.D. c. GRECE
• EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 40116/02

  SECIC c. CROATIE
• EGMR, 06.07.2010 - 24027/07

  BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 15766/03

  Oršuš u.a. ./. Kroatien
• EGMR, 19.06.2012 - 36937/06

  HAJNAL v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 24.06.2008 - 28940/95

  FOKA v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 23215/02

  ROMANOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 3363/08

  LAKATOS AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 6087/03

  GRIMAILOVS v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 08.11.2012 - 28973/11

  Z.H. v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 48977/09

  ARUTYUNYAN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 44614/07

  MILANOVIC v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 16084/90

  PROTOPAPA v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 19072/08

  HABIMI AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 16831/07

  KULIKOWSKI v. POLAND (No. 2)
• EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 13624/03

  KOKY AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
• EGMR, 04.03.2008 - 63154/00

  MARTURANA c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 2871/11

  FAKAILO (SAFOKA) ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 09.09.2014 - 33955/07

  CARRELLA c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 22.04.2014 - 73869/10

  G.C. c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 7509/08

  CONTRADA c. ITALIE (N° 2)
• EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 55421/10

  GHIURAU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 30951/10

  GOROBET v. MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 25.01.2011 - 27763/05

  LIPENCOV v. MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 10638/08

  ALEKHIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 20113/07

  Y v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 10.06.2008 - 50550/06

  SCOPPOLA c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 29.01.2008 - 19270/07

  PESCE c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 15.05.2007 - 38972/06

  GIUSTO, BORNACIN AND V. v. ITALY
• EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 40116/02

  SECIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 01.09.2015 - 26945/07

  OSTROWSKI v. POLAND
• EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 31244/06

  LOVEIKA v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 33929/03

  ALEKSANDR LEONIDOVICH IVANOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 30628/02

  UKHAN v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 24.06.2008 - 43136/02

  BASNET v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 03.06.2008 - 46956/07

  DE WITT c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 29.03.2007 - 26716/03

  BARASHKOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 16.09.2004 - 30138/02

  NURMAGOMEDOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 25.03.2004 - 24077/02

  Natalya GERASIMOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.05.2015 - 35661/11

  PEREZ LIZASO v. FINLAND
• EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 24527/08

  M.S. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 39417/07

  ALIM v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 46857/06

  ENGEL v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 23731/04

  MONTEDURO c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 25.09.2007 - 45531/06

  TRISOLINI c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 18.11.2003 - 48758/99

  VOLKOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 01.09.2015 - 20034/11

  GIORGINI v. ITALY