Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 40451/98 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2001,37726) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KERR v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 07.12.1999 - 40451/98
- EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 40451/98
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 20.04.1993 - 14327/88
SIBSON c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 40451/98
The Court does not doubt that any attempt to contest the lawfulness of the procedure for extending his detention would have had no prospects of success, given that the absence of any judicial involvement in that procedure was authorised by section 15(5) of the 1989 Act and that the Court in its Brannigan and McBride v. the United Kingdom judgment of 26 May 1993 (Series A no. 258) ruled that those applicants" complaint under Article 5 § 3 had been met by the derogation whose validity is at issue in the instant case (p. 57, § 74).