Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.07.2007 - 30426/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,57905) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BATINOVIC AND POINT-TRADE, D.O.O. v. CROATIA
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 13, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.07.2007 - 30426/03
That rule is based on the assumption, reflected in Article 13 of the Convention - with which it has close affinity - that there is an effective remedy available in the domestic system in respect of the alleged breach (see, for example, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V). - EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84
CARDOT c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.07.2007 - 30426/03
In other words, any applicant must have provided the domestic courts with the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them (see Cardot v. France, judgment of 19 March 1991, Series A no. 200, p. 19, § 36).
- EGMR, 20.09.2022 - 20952/21
A.T. v. SLOVENIA
However, for Article 6 § 1 to be applicable, the outcome of such proceedings must be decisive for the individual's civil rights or obligations (see Süßmann v. Germany, 16 September 1996, §§ 39 and 41, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Gavella v Croatia (dec.), no. 33244/02, ECHR 2006-XII; Batinovic and POINT-TRADE, d.o.o. v. Croatia (dec.), no. 30426/03, 10 July 2007; and Xero Flor w Polsce sp.