Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  EKHOLM v. FINLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 14.03.2006 - 5952/03
• EGMR, 10.07.2007 - 5952/03

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.07.2007 - 5952/03

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 34120/96

  LAUNIKARI v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.07.2007 - 5952/03

  The Court has also held that certain cases belong to a category that by its nature calls for special expedition (such as custody of children (see Hokkanen v. Finland, judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 299-A, § 72), civil status and capacity (see Mikulic v. Croatia, no. 53176/99, § 44, ECHR 2002-I) or labour disputes (see Frydlender, cited above, § 45, Launikari v. Finland, no. 34120/96, § 36, 5 October 2000).
• EGMR, 07.02.2002 - 53176/99

  MIKULIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.07.2007 - 5952/03

  The Court has also held that certain cases belong to a category that by its nature calls for special expedition (such as custody of children (see Hokkanen v. Finland, judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 299-A, § 72), civil status and capacity (see Mikulic v. Croatia, no. 53176/99, § 44, ECHR 2002-I) or labour disputes (see Frydlender, cited above, § 45, Launikari v. Finland, no. 34120/96, § 36, 5 October 2000).

 
• EGMR, 08.12.1983 - 7984/77

  PRETTO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.07.2007 - 5952/03

  The exercise of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time is subject, in civil cases, to diligence being shown by the parties concerned (see Pretto and Others v. Italy, judgment of 8 December 1983, Series A no. 71, pp. 14-15, § 33).
• EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 19823/92

  HOKKANEN v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.07.2007 - 5952/03

  The Court has also held that certain cases belong to a category that by its nature calls for special expedition (such as custody of children (see Hokkanen v. Finland, judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 299-A, § 72), civil status and capacity (see Mikulic v. Croatia, no. 53176/99, § 44, ECHR 2002-I) or labour disputes (see Frydlender, cited above, § 45, Launikari v. Finland, no. 34120/96, § 36, 5 October 2000).
• EGMR, 01.10.1982 - 8692/79

  PIERSACK v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.07.2007 - 5952/03

  The objective impartiality may be jeopardised if a judge takes part in several consecutive stages of the same set of proceedings (see, e.g., the Piersack v. Belgium judgment of 1 October 1982, Series A no. 53, pp. 14-15, § 30).