Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 8144/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,26411) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ELISEEV AND RUSKI ELITNI KLUB v. SERBIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
ELISEEV AND RUSKI ELITNI KLUB v. SERBIA
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (3) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 02.03.2005 - 71916/01
Entschädigungs- und Ausgleichsleistungsgesetzes über die Wiedergutmachung von …
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 8144/07
71916/01 and two others § 74(c), ECHR 2005-V). - EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81
POWELL ET RAYNER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 8144/07
Article 13 has been consistently interpreted by the Court as requiring a remedy in domestic law only in respect of grievances which can be regarded as "arguable" in terms of the Convention (see, for example, Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1990, § 31, Series A no. 172). - EGMR, 27.04.2004 - 62543/00
GORRAIZ LIZARRAGA ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 8144/07
There must, however, be a sufficiently direct link between the applicant and the harm that he considers he has sustained on account of the alleged violation (Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543/00, § 35, ECHR 2004-III).
- EGMR, 24.06.2021 - 77668/14
IMERI v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 10647/17
DOLIC AND HASANI v. CROATIA
The Court notes that in a number of cases it had already declared inadmissible for lack of victim status property complaints raised by the applicants in similar circumstances (see Telbis and Viziteu v. Romania, no. 47911/15, §§ 62-64, 26 June 2018; Eliseev and Ruski Elitni Klub v. Serbia (dec.), no. 8144/07, §§ 32-36, 10 July 2018; Dagostin, cited above, §§ 23-26; Neziri v. North Macedonia (dec.) [Committee], no. 55347/17, §§ 13-16, 8 July 2021; Erjuz v. North Macedonia (dec.) [Committee], no. 41790/16, §§ 18-22, 14 October 2021; and Gerguri v. North Macedonia (dec.) [Committee], no. 54953/16, §§ 17-21, 18 November 2021). - EGMR, 17.05.2022 - 37948/13
FINE DOO AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA
The Court's assessment 29. The relevant general principles regarding who can claim victim status pursuant to Article 34 of the Convention and who can allege a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention are summarised in Ankarcrona v. Sweden ((dec.), no. 35178/97, 27 June 2000) and Eliseev and Ruski Elitni Klub v. Serbia ((dec.) no. 8144/07, §§ 32-33, 10 July 2018)).