Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ALLEN c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 5 MRK
  Irrecevable (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ALLEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 5 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (13)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 21.12.2000 - 34720/97

  HEANEY ET McGUINNESS c. IRLANDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2002 - 76574/01

  Nor was he prosecuted for failing to provide information which might incriminate him in pending or anticipated criminal proceedings, as in the cases of Funke, Heaney and McGuinness and J.B. (Funke v. France judgment of 25 February 1993, Series A no. 256-A; Heaney and McGuinness v. Ireland, no. 34720/97, ECHR 2000-XII; J.B. v. Switzerland, no. 31827/96, ECHR 2001-III).
• EGMR, 03.05.2001 - 31827/96

  Verstoß gegen die Grundsätze des fairen Verfahrens wegen des Zwangs der Vorlegung …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2002 - 76574/01

  Nor was he prosecuted for failing to provide information which might incriminate him in pending or anticipated criminal proceedings, as in the cases of Funke, Heaney and McGuinness and J.B. (Funke v. France judgment of 25 February 1993, Series A no. 256-A; Heaney and McGuinness v. Ireland, no. 34720/97, ECHR 2000-XII; J.B. v. Switzerland, no. 31827/96, ECHR 2001-III).
• EGMR, 25.02.1993 - 10828/84

  FUNKE v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2002 - 76574/01

  Nor was he prosecuted for failing to provide information which might incriminate him in pending or anticipated criminal proceedings, as in the cases of Funke, Heaney and McGuinness and J.B. (Funke v. France judgment of 25 February 1993, Series A no. 256-A; Heaney and McGuinness v. Ireland, no. 34720/97, ECHR 2000-XII; J.B. v. Switzerland, no. 31827/96, ECHR 2001-III).

• EGMR, 29.06.2007 - 15809/02

  Recht auf ein faires Verfahren und Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Kriterien für eine …

  The question of the use of the statements in criminal proceedings did not arise, as his refusal to make a statement was not used as evidence: it constituted the offence itself (see Allen v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 76574/01, ECHR 2002-VIII).

  The Court noted that there were no pending or anticipated criminal proceedings against the applicant and the fact that he may have lied in order to prevent the revenue authorities from uncovering conduct which might possibly lead to a prosecution did not suffice to bring the privilege against self-incrimination into play (see Allen v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 76574/01, ECHR 2002-VIII).

• EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 38544/97

  Recht auf ein faires Strafverfahren: Schweigerecht und Selbstbelastungsfreiheit …

  The Court noted that there were no pending or anticipated criminal proceedings against the applicant and the fact that he may have lied in order to prevent the revenue authorities from uncovering conduct which might possibly lead to a prosecution did not suffice to bring the privilege against self-incrimination into play (see Allen v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 76574/01, ECHR 2002-VIII).
• EGMR, 05.04.2012 - 11663/04

  Chambaz ./. Schweiz

  Le Gouvernement affirme, en se référant à l'affaire Allen c. Royaume-Uni, que l'obligation de fournir des informations au cours d'une procédure en rappel d'impôt ne saurait violer l'interdiction de contribuer à sa propre incrimination en l'absence de procédure pénale prévisible (décision du 10 septembre 2002, no 76574/01, CEDH 2002-VIII).

 
• EGMR, 21.04.2009 - 19235/03

  MARTTINEN v. FINLAND

  The mere fact that the applicant failed to arrive at the Bailiff's office, thus not replying to any possible questions - whether or not allegedly having any relevance to the present examination - motivated the administrative fine (see Allen v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 76574/01, ECHR 2002-VIII).
• EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 58342/15

  DE LEGÉ v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) does not preclude this (see [Allen v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 76574/01, 10 September 2002] and [Marttinen v. Finland, no. 19235/03, § 68, 21 April 2009]).

  In Allen v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 76574/01, ECHR 2002-VIII, the Court held that the requirement on the applicant to make a declaration of his assets to the revenue service did not disclose any issue under Article 6 even though a separate penalty was attached to a failure to do so.

• EGMR, 04.10.2005 - 6563/03

  Schweigerecht und Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Grundsätze des Schutzes gemäß Art. 6 …

  The Court noted that there were no pending or anticipated criminal proceedings against the applicant and the fact that he may have lied in order to prevent the revenue authorities from uncovering conduct which might possibly lead to a prosecution did not suffice to bring the privilege against self-incrimination into play (see Allen v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 76574/01, ECHR 2002-VIII).
• EGMR, 10.01.2008 - 58452/00

  LUCKHOF and SPANNER v. AUSTRIA

  The question of the use of the statements in criminal proceedings did not arise, as his refusal to make a statement was not used as evidence: it constituted the offence itself (see Allen v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 76574/01, ECHR 2002-VIII).
• EGMR, 15.09.2020 - 10487/16

  SAVIC v. AUSTRIA

  The fact that he may have lied in order to prevent the revenue authorities from uncovering conduct which might possibly lead to a prosecution did not suffice to bring the privilege against self-incrimination into play (see Allen v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 76574/01, § 1, ECHR 2002-VIII).
• EGMR, 23.03.2006 - 38258/03

  VAN VONDEL v. THE NETHERLANDS

  La garantie en cause n'interdit pas en soi l'utilisation de pouvoirs coercitifs pour amener des personnes à fournir des informations concernant, par exemple, leurs avoirs financiers, quand bien même une sanction serait attachée à un refus de se conformer à ladite obligation (voir Allen c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 76574/01, CEDH 2002-VIII) ou, comme en l'espèce, pour obliger des personnes à fournir des informations à une commission d'enquête parlementaire, dans la mesure où on voit mal comment pareille commission pourrait fonctionner efficacement en l'absence de pareils pouvoirs.
• EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 56936/13

  EKLUND v. FINLAND

  In this respect, the applicant's case is similar to the cases of Allen v. the United Kingdom (dec.) (no. 76574/01, ECHR 2002-VIII) and Elomaa v. Finland (dec.), no. 37670/04, 16 March 2010, where the Court found that the applicant's subsequent conviction for the offence of making a false declaration of his assets to the tax authority was not an example of forced self-incrimination, but the result of the offence itself.
• EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 37670/04

  ELOMAA v. FINLAND
• EGMR, 18.03.2004 - 63207/00

  RIEG v. AUSTRIA
• EGMR, 18.03.2004 - 58452/00

  LUCKHOF and SPANNER v. AUSTRIA