Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.09.2013 - 10410/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,30644) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
HELANDER v. FINLAND
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
HELANDER v. FINLAND
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 03.04.2007 - 62617/00
Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte schützt private Nutzung des Internets
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2013 - 10410/10
In such circumstances the applicant might expect that the correspondence he receives is protected by Article 8 of the Convention (compare and contrast Copland v. the United Kingdom, no. 62617/00, §§ 41-42, ECHR 2007-I). - EGMR, 07.02.2002 - 53176/99
MIKULIC v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2013 - 10410/10
These obligations may involve the adoption of measures designed to secure respect for rights even in the sphere of the relations of individuals between themselves (see, for example, Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1994, § 31, Series A no. 297-C; and Mikulic v. Croatia, no. 53176/99, § 57, ECHR 2002-I). - EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 19823/92
HOKKANEN v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2013 - 10410/10
The Court reiterates that its task is not to substitute itself for the competent domestic authorities in regulating prisoners" correspondence at the national level, but rather to review under the Convention the decisions that those authorities have taken in the exercise of their power of appreciation (see, mutatis mutandis, Rózanski v. Poland, no. 55339/00, § 62, 18 May 2006; Mikulic v. Croatia, cited above, § 59; and Hokkanen v. Finland, 23 September 1994, § 55, Series A no. 299-A). - EGMR, 26.05.1994 - 16969/90
KEEGAN v. IRELAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2013 - 10410/10
In both contexts regard must be had to the fair balance that has to be struck between the competing interests of the individual and of the community as a whole; and in both contexts the State enjoys a certain margin of appreciation (see Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, § 49, Series A no. 290; and Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands, cited above). - EGMR, 27.10.1994 - 18535/91
KROON AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2013 - 10410/10
These obligations may involve the adoption of measures designed to secure respect for rights even in the sphere of the relations of individuals between themselves (see, for example, Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1994, § 31, Series A no. 297-C; and Mikulic v. Croatia, no. 53176/99, § 57, ECHR 2002-I).