Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 10.09.2020 - 46311/08, 2973/10   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2020,25858
EGMR, 10.09.2020 - 46311/08, 2973/10 (https://dejure.org/2020,25858)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 10.09.2020 - 46311/08, 2973/10 (https://dejure.org/2020,25858)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 10. September 2020 - 46311/08, 2973/10 (https://dejure.org/2020,25858)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,25858) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 03.02.2005 - 2577/02

    FOCIAC c. ROUMANIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2020 - 46311/08
    Moreover, the Court has held on numerous occasions that Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention provide for a positive obligation on the State to assist private persons in the enforcement of court judgments against other private persons (see Fuklev v. Ukraine, no. 71186/01, §§ 84 and 91, 7 June 2005; Scollo v. Italy, cited above, § 44; Fociac v. Romania, no. 2577/02, § 70, 3 February 2005; and Kesyan v. Russia, no. 36496/02, §§ 79 and 80, 19 October 2006).
  • EGMR, 19.10.2006 - 36496/02

    KESYAN v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2020 - 46311/08
    Moreover, the Court has held on numerous occasions that Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention provide for a positive obligation on the State to assist private persons in the enforcement of court judgments against other private persons (see Fuklev v. Ukraine, no. 71186/01, §§ 84 and 91, 7 June 2005; Scollo v. Italy, cited above, § 44; Fociac v. Romania, no. 2577/02, § 70, 3 February 2005; and Kesyan v. Russia, no. 36496/02, §§ 79 and 80, 19 October 2006).
  • EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

    CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2020 - 46311/08
    However, having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties and its findings under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the Court considers that it has examined the main legal question raised in the present application, specifically the lengthy non-enforcement of the decision of 24 December 2002, and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, mutatis mutandis, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, with further references).
  • EGMR, 24.11.1986 - 9063/80

    GILLOW v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2020 - 46311/08
    In particular, it is not enough for an applicant to claim that a particular place or property is a "home"; he or she must show that they enjoy concrete and persisting links with the property concerned (see, for example, Gillow v. the United Kingdom, 24 November 1986, § 46, Series A no. 109).
  • EGMR, 07.06.2005 - 71186/01

    FUKLEV v. UKRAINE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2020 - 46311/08
    Moreover, the Court has held on numerous occasions that Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention provide for a positive obligation on the State to assist private persons in the enforcement of court judgments against other private persons (see Fuklev v. Ukraine, no. 71186/01, §§ 84 and 91, 7 June 2005; Scollo v. Italy, cited above, § 44; Fociac v. Romania, no. 2577/02, § 70, 3 February 2005; and Kesyan v. Russia, no. 36496/02, §§ 79 and 80, 19 October 2006).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht