Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.10.2013 - 51355/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,27051) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TOPIC v. CROATIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-3-d - Obtain attendance of witnesses) ...
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Topic v. Croatia
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 10.10.2013 - 51355/10
- EGMR, 24.09.2015 - 51355/10
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00
MIFSUD contre la FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.10.2013 - 51355/10
Remedies available to a litigant at the domestic level are considered effective if they prevent the alleged violation or prevent it from continuing, or if they provide adequate redress for any violation that has already occurred (see Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, § 17, ECHR 2002-VIII). - EGMR, 10.04.2007 - 26137/04
BARTA v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.10.2013 - 51355/10
Therefore, Article 35 § 1 does not require that recourse should be had to remedies which are inadequate or ineffective (see Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, §§ 51-52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI, and Barta v. Hungary, no. 26137/04, § 45, 10 April 2007). - EGMR, 22.09.1994 - 13616/88
HENTRICH v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.10.2013 - 51355/10
The purpose of Article 35 is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, for example, Hentrich v. France, 22 September 1994, § 33, Series A no. 296-A, and Remli v. France, 23 April 1996, § 33, Reports 1996-II). - EGMR, 06.05.1985 - 8658/79
Bönisch ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.10.2013 - 51355/10
The Court reiterates that the guarantees contained in Article 6 § 3, including those enunciated in sub-paragraph (d), are constituent elements, amongst others, of the concept of a fair trial set forth in Article 6 § 1 (see Bönisch v. Austria, 6 May 1985, § 29, Series A no. 92). - EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86
VIDAL c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.10.2013 - 51355/10
In particular, "as a general rule, it is for the national courts to assess the evidence before them as well as the relevance of the evidence which defendants seek to adduce... Article 6 § 3 (d) leaves it to them, again as a general rule, to assess whether it is appropriate to call witnesses" (see Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, § 33, Series A no. 235-B).