Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SOROKIN v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Sorokin v. Russia

Wird zitiert von ... (7)

• EGMR, 04.07.2017 - 39655/10

  DERGALEV v. RUSSIA

  Without prejudging its decision on the admissibility and merits of the case, the Court considers that in such circumstances the Government's declaration does not provide a sufficient basis for concluding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols does not require it to continue its examination of the case (see Sorokin v. Russia, no. 67482/10, § 21, 10 October 2013, and Kalinin v. Russia, no. 54749/12, § 23, 19 February 2015).
• EGMR, 24.05.2016 - 44815/10

  SHEPEL v. RUSSIA

  Without prejudging its decision on the admissibility and merits of the case, the Court considers, in such circumstances, that the Government's declaration does not provide a sufficient basis for concluding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols does not require it to continue its examination of the case (see Sorokin v. Russia, no. 67482/10, § 21, 10 October 2013, and Kalinin v. Russia, no. 54749/12, § 23, 19 February 2015).
• EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 4963/06

  KURUSHIN v. RUSSIA

  Without prejudging its decision on the admissibility and merits of the case, the Court considers that the declaration does not provide a sufficient basis for concluding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols does not require it to continue its examination of the case (see Sorokin v. Russia, no. 67482/10, 10 October 2013).

 
• EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 33825/10

  ZHULIN v. RUSSIA

  It is especially true when an individual is remanded in custody pending trial and is taken out of a facility for interviews and other procedural acts or for medical treatment only to be returned there after a short period of time (see Sorokin v. Russia, no. 67482/10, § 27, 10 October 2013).
• EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 18506/09

  VERSHININ v. RUSSIA

  The Court has previously found that short periods of an applicant's absence from a specific facility during his pre-trial detention, when he is temporarily taken out out of that facility for interviews and other procedural acts or medical treatment, and then returned back, have no incidence on the continuous nature of that detention (see Sorokin v. Russia, no. 67482/10, § 27, 10 October 2013).
• EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 26073/09

  KARBYSHEV v. RUSSIA

  Without prejudging its decision on the admissibility and merits of the case, the Court considers that it does not provide a sufficient basis for concluding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols does not require it to continue its examination of the case (see Sorokin v. Russia, no. 67482/10, 10 October 2013).
• EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 66414/11

  BERGER v. RUSSIA

  Without prejudging its decision on the admissibility and merits of the case, the Court considers that it does not provide a sufficient basis for concluding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols does not require it to continue its examination of the case (see Sorokin v. Russia, no. 67482/10, 10 October 2013).